Indra News

Category: Review

  • Asus GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Expedition review

    Asus GeForce GTX 1050

    Classic, but very discreet

    If Asus tends to offer premium graphics cards, equipped with high-end home heatsinks called DirectCU, the company also offers less upscale models. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Expedition is one of these entry-level models, which doesn’t prevent it from being quite interesting in practice.

    The cooling system used here does not have a specific name. The radiator is quite basic since it is simply a piece of extruded aluminum.

    Cooling System

    This radiator is in direct contact with the graphics chip and only this one. The power supply stage as well as the memory do not benefit from any dissipation aid. Two fans with double ball bearings are responsible for cooling the block.

    Asus is once again using its 0dB technology here, which cuts off the fans when the card is idle. Working passively when no game is running, the card activates its ventilation when the GPU temperature rises above 55 ° C.

    You must then strain your ears to hear the very slight breath produced by the two fans. We are here facing an ultra discreet card and this does not come at the expense of the temperature of the chip which is maintained at 68 ° C.

    Factory frequencies and manual “overclocking”.

    This GTX 1050 Ti Expedition is a non factory overclocked model which therefore operates at conventional frequencies. The GPU is thus announced at 1290 MHz base and at 1392 MHz via GPU Boost.

     

    See Also : Cooler Master  Hyper  212 Black Edition Review

     

    After more than an hour of non-stop gaming , the effective frequency of the GPU oscillates between 1533 and 1645 MHz. The frequency of the 4 GB of GDDR5 memory is for its part at 1,752 MHz.

    As this is a card without a PCIe power connector, overclocking is necessarily very quickly limited by power consumption. We were thus able to reach a little over 1700 MHz for the GPU and not far from 2000 MHz for the memory.

    We will have to wait to test a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti equipped with a PCIe power connector to really see what the GPU has in its belly.

    Performance in games

     

    In games, this GeForce GTX 1050 Ti sits halfway between AMD’s Radeon RX 460 and Radeon RX 470. The first is ahead of 47% on average while the second maintains a lead of 34%.

    This model also performs better than unoverclocked GeForce GTX 960s OC models will then be matched. This ultimately allows you to play in Full HD without making too big a compromise, and in high quality.

    Power Consumption

    The power consumption of this model is very low since it is a question of 60 watts on average for the card alone. We thus gain 20 to 25 watts compared to the GeForce GTX 950 customs and, above all, we are at half of what a GTX 960 consumes.

    Not surprisingly, energy efficiency is there and shines at a very high level. This is without comparison with what AMD offers opposite, both with its Radeon RX 460 and its Radeon RX 470.

    Utility For GTX 1050

    The PCB used is quite large, although it has few components. The power supply stage is made up of three phases for the GPU and one phase for the graphics memory. Our test copy produced a moderate coilwhine (coil whistle). No PCIe power cord is needed. Three video outputs are present an HDMI 2.0b, a DisplayPort 1.4 and a DVI.

    The box contains a CD containing an overclocking utility and a graphics driver. Better to download the latest versions from the respective sites of Asus and Nvidia. There is also a quick start guide and a voucher for 15 days of Premium access to World of Warships. The warranty is 3 years.

    STRONG POINTS

    • Very discreet in games.
    • Fans off at rest.

    WEAK POINTS

    • No heatsink on the power supply and memory stage.

    CONCLUSION

    Used to premium graphics cards that offer a whole host of options, Asus shows that it is able to deliver quality entry level models as well. If it is not overclocked, this model is extremely quiet, without neglecting the cooling of the chip, maintained at a suitable temperature.

    • asus geforce gtx 1050 ti cerberus
    • asus geforce gtx 1050 ti cerberus review
    • nvidia asus geforce gtx 1050 ti 4gb
    • nvidia asus geforce gtx 1050 ti
    • asus nvidia geforce gtx 1050 ti
    • asus cerberus geforce gtx 1050 ti

     

  • Razer Blade 15 Gaming Laptop High End : Test and Review

    razer-blade-15
    razer-blade-15-gaming-laptop

    High end portable gaming PC

    If there is one manufacturer name that every gaming enthusiast should know, it is Razer ! Evolving in the high end environment, Razer prices admittedly high, but reflecting the intrinsic values of its products like the famous Blade 15 , a gaming laptop with superior technical characteristics, and that you can modulate in to some extent.

    Find now the presentation as well as our full test.

    Due to its popularity, the model is available in many specialty stores and even in some supermarkets. However, to save time and effort, it is in your interest to go through an online shopping platform, which will also ensure that you receive the equipment in the best conditions.

     

    See Also : Xbox Series X test : Comfort And Power to Spare

     

    A PC dedicated to gaming!

    As a manufacturer evolving in this field, Razer had to offer an all in one solution, succeeding on all the essential points related to the practice of video games.

    Based on hardware and software solutions such as Windows 10, Intel Core or even Nvidia GeForce Series, it not only allows use for the most demanding video games of the generation, but also all applications requiring significant resources, such as livestream , animation or even video editing.

    Related Post : Acer Predator Helios 300 Test an Review

    A common base, several variants

    We were talking about a solution, but we actually find an Advanced Model the first released as well as a Base Model with less advanced features, but also at a more attractive price. For both versions, however, there is a unique base.

    Spesification

    • 15.6-inch full HD touchscreen 4K display, with IPS panel with thin edges (4.9mm)
    • NVDIA GeForce Series GTX or RTX graphics card
    • Intel Core i7 processor
    • Aluminum frame
    • Ultra-thin design: 1.68cm
    • Weight about 2kg
    • 16Gb RAM memory
    • A customizable RGB keyboard (Razer Chroma)
    • 3 USB-C connectors, 1 Thunderbolt USB-C port, one HDMI port, one MiniDisplay port
    • Bluetooth technology 5
    • Maximum battery life of 6 hours
    • 44 blade ventilation system with steam chamber
    • Dolby Atmos Microphone and Speakers
    • 1Mp webcam (720p resolution)

    You will have noticed: we have not detailed certain crucial points, such as storage, graphics card, processor or battery. Quite simply because it is on these points that the two variants make the difference!

    The differences between Razer Blade 15 Base Model and Advanced Model. The first version, also the most sophisticated the Advanced Model lets you choose between several cards: an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, RTX 2070 or RTX 2080 , all three of Max-Q design and incorporating Optimus technology.

    On this point, the Base Model, released more recently, directly embeds the GTX 1660 Ti VR. The processor also varies in newer versions, so the base model comes with an Intel iRNUM i7 (6-core) while the Advanced Model comes with an i7 Core Family. Note that if both are boosted by 16Gb RAM , the Base Model only allows an extension up to 32Gb, where the Advanced allows double, at 64Gb.

    Storage & battery

    On the storage side, several solutions are available to you within the two variants: you can opt for a configuration including an SSD and an HHD, of 128/256 and 1TB / 2TB depending on the configurations. You can also go for a blank slot for the HDD and focus on the SSD alone, pushing up to a 512GB SSD.

    Regarding the screen, the Advanced Model offers you the choice of upgrading for a higher refresh rate, at 144Hz against 60Hz for the base model. Customization options are also enhanced on the advanced model, which allows you to set the backlighting key by key where the basic model is single zone.

    The power of the battery increases consecutively in order to compensate for the increase in resources, rising to 80Wh against 65Wh for the base model, although this does not change the use, the maximum autonomy being always set at 6h.

    Summary of our opinion on the Razer Blade 15

    Aesthetic in presentation, formidable in use the Blade 15 dazzles us with its performance. If it compensates for its performance by heat spreading over the entire chassis, it remains high end, deploying an obvious quality of construction, perfect by elaborate finishes.

    Its attractive thin edges leave more room for the action, which you admire thanks to a formidable full HD touch screen. To return to the aestheticism of the product, the design of the Razer Blade 15 strongly reminds us of a Macbook Pro, which is a compliment given the importance of this point for the Apple brand.

    We love

    • Durable and solid construction; aluminum frame
    • The high-resolution screen with perfect colorimetry
    • CPU and GPU performance
    • Storage solutions
    • Autonomy, interesting for a varied use
    • Its perfect finishes and undeniable aesthetic qualities

    We like less

    • The average quality of the speakers
    • Default performance of the processor to calibrate
    • Significant heating that affects the entire chassis

    Our full review of the Razer Blade 15 gaming PC

    Now let’s go into the details of our test, point by point. Note that we are based on the basic version the Model Base but that we also have a word for the advanced model, performance side, when it is relevant.

    razer-blade-15-editing-video-gaming

    Frame and screen

    This is the point where Razer surprises us the most: the aluminum alloy and CNC chassis deploys tremendous strength and displays a high end look noticeable at first glance.

    We appreciate the manufacturer’s efforts to refine the computer as much as possible a true synonym of luxury by giving it slightly pronounced edges for a more generous display as well as a thickness of only 1.68cm.

    And believe our experience: When the discovery of this build quality is complete, your eyes will instantly be on the screen. And what a screen! Its 15.6-inch size allows for a good balance between mobility and display, deploying a full HD 1920 x 1080 IPS resolution.

    For refined colorimetry, each screen individually calibrated at the factory. Note, as indicated previously, that you can opt for a refresh at 60Hz or 144Hz.

    Most

    • Ultra-thin edges
    • High quality aluminum frame
    • Full HD and touch screen

    The lessers

    • Nothing to report

    Aesthetics and customization

    Not only is the whole thing good, but also aesthetic: the construction gives the Razer Blade a minimalist and modern look quite successful its finesse allowing it to assert itself, according to the manufacturer, as “the laptop world’s thinnest 15.6-inch gaming machine ”.

    The finishes are worked and the green color  emblematic of the manufacturer – covers the logo as well as the connectors and USB ports .

    But obviously what you want to hear about is of course the RGB backlighting. And there, as we told you, the choice is left to you  by zone or key by key. In either case, the Synapse software suite is complete and pretty well done, although we may regret a lack of intuitiveness during the first uses. It will therefore be necessary to go through tutorials or simply to rummage to manage to take it correctly in hand.

    Most

    • Fine worked and aesthetic edges
    • Graphic elements
    • Customizable backlighting

    The lessers

    • Synapse software takes some time to get started

    Performance

    The performance of the Intel CPU and the Nvidia GPU (processor and graphics card). As a gaming PC, this is obviously where we expect it the most! The performance of the graphics card is frankly well exploited by the device, offering maximum fluidity on games with advanced graphics. In Full HD, in-game performance is very fast for RTX ranges, with high levels of graphics.

    Thus, TomsHardware data reveals high fps in Ultra on games like World War Z or GTA 5 (with x8 anti-aliasing ). Although for the latter, the fps drop slightly below 60 for the RTX 2060. The performances remain all the same similar, since one notes on average 55-62fps, from the 2060 to the 2080.

    In 4K, for the same game, it will be preferable to lower the anti-aliasing to 2x while reducing the quality of the graphics to “high”. With this configuration, the fps are preserved around 55 to 66fps, again from 2060 to 2080. On the other hand, on a game like Far Cry 5, you will have to be content with normal graphics for FPS limited to 45-55fps. A point on which the Radeon VII is doing better.

    Inside GTX 1660

    If you are going to look to the GTX 1660 Ti for the Base Model, expect great performance in Full HD too. With around 70fps for The Witcher 3, Far Cry 5 and Battlefield V in Ultra, over 110fps for Wolfenstein II.

    In Ultra and x8 antialiasing, and even a solid 53fps for GTA in “very high” graphics quality and x4 antialiasing. In 2560 × 1440, obviously, performance drops, but remains very good for games like Battlefield V in ultra (nearly 50fps), Far Cry 5 in Ultra and HD textures (54fps) or The Witcher 3 in Ultra (54fps) .

    Configuration System

    Thus, depending on the configuration, the machine gets off handily. Without difficulties? Not so sure, because it compensates for its performance by a significant release of heat. And if we can not blame the ventilation system, relatively innovative, the fault is however on the chassis.

    This conducts heat over its entire surface, so that the keyboard can quickly become relatively hot at high performance. It may therefore be interesting to use an additional external ventilation solution to avoid the feeling of discomfort for the most intense parts.

    On the processor side, the Intel Core i7-9750H as well as the Intel Core i7 Family with their 6 cores are formidable in use and do not fail to confer speed and responsiveness to the computer. However, as Les Numériques points out in their dedicated test, it is necessary to use the Synapse software. Then to switch the processor from “balanced” to “creator” to observe an increase in performance, with a rate at 3.3GHz. against 2.9GHz for the default mode.

    Most

    • Excellent graphics card performance
    • No drop in FPS
    • Ray tracing enabled
    • Maximum use of screen

    The lessers

    • The entire surface of the chassis takes heat
    • You need to calibrate the processor via Synapse

    Software And Support

    Razer Blade 15 Software support driver and manual guide

    The performance of the speakers

    This is not necessarily the point that convinced us the most. Listening is indeed not very generous: the midrange, bass and bass thus have a significant range than on other devices of similar configuration. The design convinces us, on the other hand, more, since the manufacturer decides to place the speakers in frontdirectly. In order to enjoy sound directed directly to the user.

    An interesting choice, even if it does not allow to benefit from an exceptional rendering. The output power being however important, you can amply compensate in installation an external audio solution, such as a hi-fi or portable speaker. Which will allow you to compensate at the same time the low range of sound frequencies for the mediums and the bass.

    Most

    • Its directed to the user
    • High output power

    The lessers

    • Relative poverty of mediums and serious
    • The voices are a little high

    Nomadic or sedentary use?

    Let’s get it right a gaming PC is virtually dedicated to home use. Associating it with a portable format therefore represents a challenge that Razer succeeds relatively well here. With a reasonable weight of 2kg, it still carries a diet of nearly 700g. In short, for carrying in a satchel over a long distance this is not necessarily ideal but a backpack will do the trick. Likewise, depending on the duration of your trip, you will not necessarily have to take the power supply with you.

    The autonomy of 6.30 hours on average is frankly admirable for a gaming laptop, for classic Wi-Fi use. Internet browsing / optimal brightness. On the other hand, this drops if the refresh rate of your screen goes to 144Hz (against 60Hz). In which case you can count about thirty minutes less for autonomy.

    Obviously, in games, you can not expect a monster outfit, although this obviously depends on the resources that the game in question requires. For maximum performance, allow a maximum of 1 hour to 1:30 of play. In other words, avoid playing on battery power, except for the most economical games! Note, moreover, that it is possible for you to boost it. By reducing the brightness or by switching to “Airplane mode”, for example, you can expect an autonomy of more than 10 hours.

    Our final opinion on the Razer Blade 15

    If Razer is establishing itself as one of the most popular manufacturers in the business. It’s not for nothing and this model proves it to us without question. It dazzles us in all its variants, from the Advanced to the Base Model. Offering various solutions allowing to modulate both the components and the price. If this turns out to be high, let us note at the same time that the quality of construction as much as the performances justify it.

    Especially in a portable format, more expensive than the fixed equivalent for the same components, because requiring a microphone specific construction. Comfortable, it makes you want to use it both at home and outside. Which it allows to a certain extent thanks to its autonomy. There are still some possible improvements, especially with regard to heat conduction more than the cooling system. Which is successful as well as the quality of the speakers. Do not hesitate to compose with a speaker: the output power allows you to “spit out the decibels”!

    • razer blade 15 gaming performance
    • razer 15.6 blade 15 gaming notebook
    • Notebook razer 15.6 blade 15 gaming 2022
    • review razer blade 15 gaming laptop

  • Review Logitech G203 Lightsync Wired Gaming Mouse

    Logitech G203 Gaming Mouse Review

    At the end of 2016, Logitech launched a mouse dedicated to professional gamers. Simply called “Pro” (initially “Pro Gaming” and also called “G Pro”). A mouse unfortunately sold at a high price (79.99 €) despite a simple design and embedded technologies already proven by the Swiss manufacturer.

    Never mind, Logitech has decided to decline this mouse in a more affordable version ($40). The G203 Prodigy, which does not ultimately have much to envy its big sister.

    Good Gaming Mouse

    A good gaming mouse can easily cost north of $ 100, but Logitech is targeting budget-conscious people today with its latest gaming mouse entry, which costs just $ 40. The Logitech G203 Lightsync may be cheap, but it certainly doesn’t skimp on features.

    See Also : Logitech G305 Best Wired Gaming Mouse

    In addition to offering six fully programmable buttons, the “Gaming Grade” sensor can be adjusted between 200 and 8,000 DPI, allowing per-game adjustment if required. Best of all, the G203 is compatible with the Logitech G Hub app, which lets you save up to five presets.

    Buttons for Logitech G203

    The main left and right mouse buttons are equipped with a proprietary “Logitech G Button Tension System” metal spring which is intended to provide a consistent click experience throughout the life of the mouse. And as the name suggests, the G203 features the Lightsync RGB lighting system, enabling mouse-driven light shows using 16.8 million colors.

    At $ 40, it’s a good starting point for anyone to get into PC gaming. Logitech has configured the G203 to work with no modifications needed until you are ready to do so.

    It’s also highly compatible, working with Windows 7, 8, and 10, as well as macOS 10.10 or later and Chrome OS. Finally, there are two color options: white and black, the USB cable is 2.1 meters long. Which should be enough for any configuration,

    Ergonomics

    At first glance, it’s hard to find any differences between the G203 Prodigy and the G Pro. The shell is identical, made of plastic with a grainy coating to avoid fingerprints, the finish is just as neat and the mouse still seems robust.

    See Also :Logitech G502 Hero Mouse Gaming Review

    Only the cable changes, since that of the Pro is braided when that of the G203 is sheathed. The latter is nevertheless quite flexible and does not seem particularly less solid. In short, it is not in terms of design or ergonomics that the two mice stand out.

    We also emit the same criticisms of the G203, that is to say that if its ambidextrous shape seems interesting for left-handers, the presence of buttons only on the left edge significantly reduces the interest of this mouse for this fringe. users.

    Of course, this avoids involuntary activations for right-handed people, but one could have imagined a different arrangement of the buttons or a system of removable buttons as on the G900 to avoid these inconveniences. Alas, left-handed players will not look more to the G203 than to the G Pro.

    Handling For Logitech G203

    The handling is not without reproach either. Indeed, if the plastic is not unpleasant in the hand, it remains relatively slippery, especially on the edges, which can make lifting and rapid movements a little tricky.

    Fortunately, the small size of the G203 (116.6 x 62.2 x 38.2 mm), its low mass (85 g, or 2 g more than the G Pro) and the inclination of its edges allow a good maneuverability.

    As long as you hold the mouse firmly enough, there is no contraindication to using it in low sensitivity, for example, even if you tend to prefer non-slip coatings on the edges to avoid any risk . Small mouse requires, we prefer to use it with the fingertips or as a claw. Only small hands can put all or part of the palm on it.

    Comfort Mouse for G203

    The G203 therefore aims above all for a certain nervousness rather than comfort. And this can be seen right down to the main click buttons. Very sensitive, they also benefit from the tension system that Logitech uses on its gaming mice since the G900. A small spring keeps the button contactor on that of the switch to improve the consistency of the click and its responsiveness.

    If the G203 does benefit from Omron switches, like the G Pro. These are only guaranteed for 10 million activations (20 for the G Pro).

    The two slice buttons are also quite convincing, producing a fairly sharp click. Their small size, however, makes them less accessible than those of mice like the G403. The click of the dial is also of good quality and tastes good not to be too hard. Finally, the last button located above the wheel is used to change the sensitivity of the mouse on the fly. If it is not very accessible, we reach it despite everything without twisting our fingers too much.

    For its part, the wheel is very good for the game, with its notches sufficiently well marked. No horizontal scrolling on the other hand, it is about a wheel all that there is of more basic. Mouse for gamers requires, here we can not escape the single-zone RGB backlighting which illuminates both the brand’s G logo and a small border at the base of the mouse.

    It has no function apart from aesthetics and will therefore be content to brighten up the offices of those who appreciate multicolored lights. This backlight is fortunately not disturbing in use, the hand largely covering the illuminated areas. It is also possible to deactivate it.

    Precision

    The biggest difference between G203 and G Pro is indeed in the innards of the mouse, in particular at the level of the sensor. Exit the Pixart PMW3366, make way for a home sensor called “Mercury”. Still of optical type, this one displays inferior technical characteristics: maximum acceleration supported of 25 g. Operation at speeds of 5.08 m / s and adjustable sensitivity from 200 to 8000 dpi.

    This is still enough to satisfy the players. very few of them being the most nervous capable of exceeding such speeds. Even while performing the ample and rapid movements required to play in very low sensitivity.

    The same goes for the maximum sensitivity, largely sufficient to go so far as to meet the expectations of those who use several Ultra HD screens.

     

    In practice, it is therefore difficult to fault this Mercury sensor, the difference with the PMW3366 being fairly maintained. We can barely notice a very slightly better feeling of fluidity with the Pixart sensor or the Hero sensor of the latest Logitech mice. But this is really not significant. In any case, we did not find any fault in acceleration or stability during our tests.

    Regarding the recognition of surfaces. If it is always necessary to avoid glass and other surfaces that are too shiny or transparent with an optical sensor. we have not detected any particular problem here with fabric or plastic mouse pads, or even with our slightly satin desk. The G203’s sensor seems to behave as well as the G Pro’s.

    Logitech Assistant Software

    Logitech’s Video Game Assistant software, common to the manufacturer’s various gaming peripherals. Allows you to create multiple usage profiles to automatically adapt settings to stored applications.

    For each profile, it is thus possible to change the assignment of the keys and to set up to five levels of sensor sensitivity. The backlight can also be changed to take advantage of different light effects.

    Finally, an option makes it possible to optimize the precision of the sensor according to the surface on which the mouse is used.

    STRONG POINTS

    • Compact and light.
    • Pleasant handling, well-placed buttons.
    • Convincing optical sensor.
    • Responsive buttons.
    • Integrated memory.
    • Robust design.

    WEAK POINTS

    • Rather intended for right-handed people despite its symmetrical shape (buttons only on the left edge).
    • Dial without side buttons.
    • Slippery coating.

    CONCLUSION

    Despite the use of a sensor that is less swift than that of the G Pro, the G203 Prodigy is doing with honors. Above all, its half price makes it much more attractive for players looking for a small, lively and robust mouse, particularly suitable for FPS and Moba.

  • Hyperx Cloud Revolver S Review

    Hyperx Cloud Revolver S Review

    Hyperx Cloud Revolver S Review – This new gaming headset marks a turning point at HyperX: new name, new look, new materials, new microphone. Above all, the manufacturer wants to seduce FPS enthusiasts by offering a model that would be studied for the practice of the genre thanks to excellent sound spatialization . Let’s see if all these changes risk turning the Revolver against its builder.

    Ergonomics

    Even if its atypical look may surprise you, the HyperX Revolver is an over-ear headset that benefits from good manufacturing quality, serious assembly, a large metal headband and plastic shells to protect the ear cups. The only details that bother us concern the apparent wiring between the top of the ear cups and the base of the lower hoop as well as the non-removable cable.

    Apart from that, the helmet is both strong, light and relatively flexible, which bodes well for good durability if you take a minimum of care of your belongings. If you are often on the move, know that HyperX has chosen to get rid of the many accessories that were one of the strengths of the Cloud . So there is no storage case to protect the headphones or even an extension cable or additional pads.

    Comfort

    This Revolver uses a double headband that is increasingly found in the world of audio gaming . This choice is quite clearly inspired by what can be found at Steelseries with the Siberia 650, for example. The problem with this upper metal hoop is that it tends to resonate when wearing the helmet on the head and touching this part. Fortunately, the phenomenon is much better controlled here.

    HyperX has kept the headband of the Cloud, but the foam here is a little more flexible and airy. The two earpieces are connected to the headband by a ball-and-socket pivot system that allows slight vertical or horizontal movement. The removable leatherette pads are similar to those of the Cloud: they are particularly thick and soft to the touch.

    This combination adds a new dimension to the comfort provided. The Revolver sits naturally on the head and adapts quite well to different body types, especially larger heads. The weight is well distributed and the pressure points are homogeneous all around the ears. The pads do not provide an extreme feeling of heat.

    Good Controler

    However, we find that the pressure exerted on the top of the head is just a little too much for large heads in the first few hours, which can be annoying if you decide to do long sessions from the start. The shaping and softening of the pad are done little by little, but you always feel a little the arch in the end. A slightly more flexible and less thick lower arch could have changed the situation. The acoustic design is a bit more open, so the passive isolation is far from extreme. It still allows you to cut yourself off from the environment to be comfortable in the game.

    The Revolver connects to console controllers and mobile devices via a particularly thick braided cable that measures about one meter. It ends with a 3.5 mm 4-pin mini-jack connector. A 2m extension cable, which terminates in a double 3.5mm 3-point mini-jack is also supplied. It embeds a command that allows you to control the listening volume via a continuous potentiometer and which allows you to mute the microphone via a switch. Like many other headsets, the Revolver does not have a dedicated computer application.

    Audio

    The sound performance of this headset is generally good. The rendering is certainly musical and the W signature is marked, but in the end it remains relatively controlled and precise.

    The low end is delivered with great depth, but it’s not extremely warm. This remains controlled, however, because the membranes never really get carried away and there is only a small masking effect on the low mids. The voices are particularly well put forward. They are clear and intelligible, but female vocals lack a bit of warmth and therefore sound more pinched than male vocals.

    This W signature is still a little marked in the high-mids/treble. The sibilance wakes up from time to time depending on the songs, just like the “fff” of the voices. The guitars, especially the electric guitars with distortion, are a bit sharper and more aggressive than usual. Our favorite pieces in this kind of case, signed The Dillinger Escape Plan and Oh, Sleeper, however, remain soft enough to be listened to without being too aggressive.

    The Revolver offers a nice reproduction of stereophony even if, again, we expected even more width. However, the sound stage remains particularly readable and each element that composes it is easily identifiable. This is less the case in depth, especially on the evaluation of the distance in play. It is a little better than what the Cloud is capable of, but not as good as some other references.

    Microphone

    This model also innovates in terms of microphone. This one still remains removable and gooseneck, but it is now without windshield and protected by rubber. It is easy to handle and easily positioned in front of the mouth. It captures the voice very well and cuts out enough outside noise to be heard clearly. However, a small gain boost will not be too much to achieve a good level of capture.

    Conclusion

    Hyper took a risky bet by changing a large part of the codes that made the Cloud so successful . The new design of the Revolver is more comfortable and more adapted to different morphologies, but the many accessories have disappeared. The sound reproduction is really different, but it remains overall controlled and precise. In the end, and contrary to what HyperX announces, this model has nothing really special for FPS games. It will satisfy those looking for an effective closed helmet that does not isolate extremely, but which offers a greater feeling of ventilation.

     

  • Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 : Review The gaming laptop

    Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 is the spearhead of the Republic of Gamers range. This version is equipped with an Intel Core i9-12900H processor with Alder Lake architecture. While the GPU is entrusted to Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3070 Ti.

    Presentation The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 is a portable PC model designed primarily/ notebook gaming for gamers looking for the best in technology without compromising on performance. A showcase for the Taiwanese manufacturer. This model also gives it the opportunity to prove its know-how with some exclusive features. Such as the ROG Keystone, an NFC key that is inserted on the right of the keyboard and allows you to personalize the PC, or even to access a hidden partition.

    Construction The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    The ROG Strix Scar 17 is far from being a model of sobriety. From the hood, its membership in the Republic Of Gamers is well highlighted. In plastic, it sports the famous backlit ROG eye. The most attentive will also have noticed the selective varnish strip adorned with the ROG logo, which crosses the hood diagonally.

    Opening the screen reveals a two-tone piano with an opaque black side and another transparent. Apart from the “wow” effect of the discovery, its usefulness is nil: no real component is visible, not even a rotating fan. The coating of the piano suffers from the absence of anti-fingerprint treatment, the slightest pressure on it leaving marks that are difficult to clean. Cleaning is also complicated and often leaves traces.

    Keyboard

    The RGB backlit keyboard provides a pleasant typing with a good response. It has a full numeric keypad and five macro keys on its top. It is obviously possible to customize the backlight with the Armory Crate software – the possibilities offered are such that you could spend the afternoon there.

    Like the keyboard, the large touchpad offers a smooth glide and the various Windows gestures are well taken into account. On the far right on the right edge, a location is provided for the ROG Keystone (in red with the ROG logo). This is a key equipped with an NFC chip that allows you to link an ROG account in order to find its personalization profiles (ventilation, backlighting, etc.).  and to set up a storage space only visible when the key is present.

    Connectivity

    The connectivity of the Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 goes to the essentials with two USB 3.2 ports and a jack on the left side. Behind the screen, between the two vents, are two USB-C ports, an HDMI port and an RJ45 socket to the 2.5G standard.

    Access to these ports is also quite painful, because there is no indication on the chassis to indicate their presence. We also regret the absence of a memory card reader, a webcam and, to a lesser extent, a fingerprint reader to unlock the session. However, there is plenty of space on this 17-inch chassis.

    The wireless connection is ensured, not by an Intel chip as we could have believed, but a MediaTek version. The MT7922, also used at AMD under the name RZ616, manages wifi 6E at 2400 Mb/s and Bluetooth 5.2.

    Cooling

    In terms of cooling, Asus has provided the ROG Strix Scar 17 with two fans, four radiators, four heat pipes and liquid metal type thermal paste to maximize heat exchange.

    Thermal imaging does not reveal anything alarming for a laptop dedicated to gaming. On the keyboard, the temperatures recorded are even rather low with just under 41 ° C at the hottest point. The ZQSD keys oscillate around 35°C, while the rest of the keyboard stays perfectly cool.

    The dedicated CPU vents are the hottest after our gaming session with almost 58°C behind the screen and 55.8°C on the left side. The vents on the right for the GPU are 10°C cooler.

    Noise pollution amounts to 50.5 dB in Turbo mode. Suffice to say that the neighbors will be quite annoyed after about fifteen minutes of play. Using Performance mode in Armory Crate reduces the perceived sound level by two (47.1 dB), while Silent mode does not exceed 37 .1dB.

    The level of performance will be impacted by the cooling mode. Thus, we obtain 82 fps under Assassin’s Creed Valhalla in Turbo mode, the Performance mode allowing 74 fps, while the Silent mode will “only” offer 60 fps.

    Performance The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    To animate its ROG Strix Scar 17, Asus has teamed up with Intel and therefore integrates a Core i9-12900H with Alder Lake hybrid architecture, 32 GB of DDR5 RAM and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti graphics card. Let’s go back to the processor.

    Which therefore has six high-performance cores (P-Cores), hyperthreaded and clocked at 2.5 GHz with a boost of 5 GHz, and eight low-power cores (E-Cores) at 1.8 GHz with a boost of 3.8GHz. During an encoding, we noted an average frequency of 3.61 GHz for the P-Cores and 2.79 GHz. For the E-Cores with respective maximum frequencies of 4.92 GHz and 3.79 GHz.

    The performance index of the Core i9-12900H is 176, far ahead of the Ryzen 9 5900HX. Core i9-11980HK which have an index close to 140 depending on the laptop in which they are integrated. Note, however, that the score of the Core i9-12900H could have been higher if the cooling system managed to keep the temperature of the Core i9 cores below 100°C. Beyond this temperature, the processor reduces its frequency and therefore performance. We were thus able to observe drops in framerate in game when the processor sporadically drops to 399 MHz.

    Games The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    ROG Strix Scar 17 features the latest GPU announced by Nvidia , the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. The version selected by Asus claims a maximum TGP of 150 W; it is therefore the most efficient version of this GPU.

    Thus equipped, the ROG Strix Scar 17 obtains a performance index of 195. Slightly lower than the Lenovo Legion 5 Pro equipped with a GeForce RTX 3070 (140 W). The explanation is to be found on the side of the processor, which lowers its frequency. A phenomenon particularly visible in Call Of Duty and Cyberpunk 2077. Dragging with it the frequency of the GPU, even in the most performance (and therefore ventilation) mode. high offered by the Asus Armory Crate software (Turbo mode).

    Full HD Definition Screen

    With a Full HD definition and all the settings pushed to the maximum, our range of games runs at around 90 fps without raytracing. Activating the latter drastically drops the number of frames per second, so you have to activate DLSS to go above the 60 fps mark in compatible games.

    In 2560 x 1440 px – the native definition of our ROG Strix Scar 17 panel. With rasterized rendering, the number of images per second displayed is around 60 fps, a good point. Only Cyberpunk 2077 gets an average framerate of 39 fps. Enabling raytracing makes Cyberpunk 2077, Metro EE, and The Medium barely playable. Therefore, the activation of DLSS will be necessary to enjoy these games.

    Screen The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    The ROG Scar 17 is equipped with an IPS panel displaying 2560 x 1440 px and able to reach a refresh rate of 240 Hz. Asus also offers a Full HD version which reaches 360 Hz . If you play competitive games online, we recommend this 360 Hz version. As for fans of the latest AAA games, the version we tested seems more appropriate.

    The WQHD panel selected by Asus obtains a delta E of 1.8, well below 3 where the colorimetric drifts begin to be visible. The color temperature also comes close to the theoretical ideal of 6500 K (6574 K measured). The contrast is on the other hand a little weak with 1104:1 readings with the probe. Nothing alarming, but the blacks will draw a little on the grays.

    The brightness is 304 cd / m², a sufficient value for indoor use, knowing that the panel has a good anti-reflective treatment (reflectance measured at 17.8%). Finally, an essential point for a laptop dedicated to gaming, the responsiveness of the panel was measured at 9 ms. Which places the ROG Scar 17 among the most valiant in our database.

    Audio The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    Asus has given its ROG Scar 17 four speakers: two under the screen and facing the user. These act as tweeters  and two others placed under the chassis at the front. Which act as woofers. Listening, the sound volume is more than enough to enjoy its films and series, the stereo being well marked.

    The headphone output provides an output level strong enough to handle high impedance headphones. The distortion and crosstalk measurement does not reveal any anomalies. However, we regret a somewhat weak dynamic which could annoy sound professionals.

    Mobility / Autonomy The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    The measurements of the Strix Scar 17 are 39 x 28 cm for 2.83 cm at its thickest point. We are far from the gaming laptops that we knew a few years ago with thicknesses exceeding 4 cm. Its weight of 2.9 kg also places it in the average of 17.3-inch gaming laptops . It is therefore quite possible to transport the ROG Strix Scar 17 in a suitable backpack.

    Asus has equipped the Scar 17 with a 90 Wh battery. A substantial capacity, but which does not make it possible to last the day. In video playback with the screen set to 200 cd / m², the Scar 17 allowed us to watch our favorite series for 6 h 40 min (Netflix under Chrome).

    Conclusion The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 offers a high-flying configuration with its 12th Gen Intel Core i9 processor and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. Its properly calibrated and responsive screen allows you to fully enjoy video games, with or without raytracing activated. However, the quality of the plastics is not up to the performance. Nor is the cooling system which, unfortunately, struggles to cool the assembly, limiting the capabilities of the assembly.

  • Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2 Review Headphones

    Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2

    Review Audio Technica is riding on the success of its iconic ATH-M50 headphones. And giving it a third lease of life with the ATH-M50xBT2 to conquer nomadic music lovers. This 2nd Bluetooth version is of course accompanied by many new features.

    Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2 Date Release

    Freshly launched for the start of the 2021 school year. The ATH-M50xBT2 carries with it the heritage of the M50 line and is positioned as the standard bearer of the Japanese brand’s audio know-how with the general public on the Bluetooth mobile headset market.  It is therefore not surprising that Audio Technica highlights the history of this range to stand out.

    Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2 Focusing on improvement

    This “v2” does not bring any real changes on the acoustic level. All the new features focusing on improving the experience of using the headset. Multipoint connection, USB-C port, better call quality, autonomy even more generous. Compatibility with the LDAC codec, smartphone application to extend the possibilities of personalization. And all this without seeing the marketing price increase.

    All the ingredients therefore seem to come together to make this ATH-M50xBT2 a very good mobile headset. And that’s what we’re going to try to check during this test.

    Manufacturing & accessories

    The ATH-M50xBT2 is strictly identical to its predecessors in terms of design. Capitalizing again and again on its “studio/monitoring” heritage, these headphones are therefore functional, at the risk of not being the most elegant and discreet there is.

    There’s not much that can be criticized for its overall sturdiness and maneuverability. The headband resists twisting without flinching and the hinges allow both an ultra generous pivot of the ear cups as well on the horizontal axis than vertical. While allowing the latter to fold up towards the arch.

    No rigid case, but a soft carrying pouch is provided to accommodate the headset. And its two detachable cables (a small USB-C to USB-A cable and a mini-jack cable of about 1.2 m).

    Comfort & support

    Without fundamental design changes, the ATH-M50xBT2 provides the same comfort experience as its predecessor.

    Weight the helmet

    the weight of the helmet (310 g) is very well balanced, as are the pressure points and pinch effects which remain discreet. The generous deployment of the notched headband of the helmet allows it to find its place on the head, large or small, without any problem.

    The ear cups do not leave a monster room to accommodate his ears, but it remains sufficient in terms of width and height. The good thickness of the pads allows a pleasant contact, failing to let the ears breathe.

    User experience

    As we mentioned in the presentation of this test, the second version of this ATH-M50xBT is largely justified by numerous ergonomic changes which make the headphones very pleasant to use on a daily basis.

    Getting started is childish. Many alerts are integrated to guide the user. Unless you are absolutely Anglophobic the voice aids being only offered in English. Beginners will have no trouble finding their way around. The headset houses a line of 4 mechanical buttons that provide access to all the essential controls, and even a little more.

    The circular button is in fact dedicated to waking up the voice assistant of the smartphone. And can even serve as a shortcut to interact with Amazon Alexa.  Since the headset displays advanced compatibility with this assistant. As was the case on the previous model, we can still point out the few difficulties in sometimes differentiating certain buttons from each other.

    For those who want to go further, Audio Technica has some nice surprises in store thanks to its Audio Technica Connect app (iOS/Android). It gives us the pleasure of offering a whole range of relevant advanced features. And settings while maintaining a simple and intuitive interface. There are the classic indications of battery level, volume, some user guides, the possibility of locating your headphones more easily or of selecting the Bluetooth codec (SBC, AAC or LDAC when the playback device allows it) .

    Autonomy

    As if the promise of 50 hours of autonomy were not already impressive. The ATH-M50xBT2 was even more generous during our test. The headphones indeed delivered us on multiple occasions more than 55 hours of use, passing moreover by the most energy-consuming Bluetooth codec (LDAC). It goes without saying that this is an excellent score, capable of satisfying the most intensive uses.

    Handsfree

    The quality of voice capture was not the strong point of the first ATH-M50xBT. Audio Technica has therefore endeavored to improve this point on this second version.

    Latency

    Improving communication latency in Bluetooth was also one of the works carried out by the manufacturer for this ATH-M50xBT. Basically, the headphones are not the brightest, even if joint use with a video playback application allows you to take advantage of sufficient automatic compensation not to feel any lag disabling.

    For all other use cases that could not benefit from this compensation. The headset has a “Low Latency” mode which drastically reduces the delay induced by the Bluetooth connection to less than 90 ms. The perceived sound/image shift is then much more acceptable, for playing video games on smartphones or Switches, for example.

    • audio-technica ath-m50xbt2
    • Review audio-technica ath-m50xbt2
    • audio-technica ath-m50xbt2 wireless headphone
    • audio-technica ath-m50xbt2 bluetooth closed-back studio monitoring headphones

  • Razer Iskur Gaming Chair Review – Back Support

    Razer Iskur review

    Razer Iskur review: a well-finished gaming chair

    With the extremely solid Razer Iskur, the hardware maker is making a solid debut in high-end gaming chairs

    Razer, along with brands such as SteelSeries, Logitech, and Corsair, is a renowned manufacturer of hardware for gamers. The range has grown considerably over the years and goes well beyond mice, keyboards and headsets. The Singaporean-American company is now even adding its first gaming chair to its arsenal of gaming accessories and is ripping itself into the top segment on gaming chair legs from Secretlab and Noblechairs, among others.

    The Razer Iskur Office Chair is the first of its kind from Razer. Launched at the end of 2020, it takes the design of a bucket seat, widely used in the world of gaming . The Iskur was marketed at a price of 499 €, which puts it in front of a competitor like the Secretlab Titan.

    Design

    Staying comfortably seated for long hours playing or working requires minimal adjustments to your chair. On this point, Iskur offers an initial adjustment that is as obvious as it is essential: the height of the seat. This can be adjusted from 44 to 54 cm, which is an average amplitude. This corresponds to the recommendations of Razer, which promises comfort to users from 1.70 to 1.90 m. However, it should not be too wide.

    Indeed, the seat width of the Iskur is only 40 cm. Even for someone on the small side, this somewhat limits the spacing of the legs. The most imposing templates will undoubtedly pass their way.

    See Also : Razer Seiren  X review  and driver support

     

    Armrests

    Good point for armrests which can be adjusted in 4 directions (4D armrests). These elements must be able to adjust to the height of the worktop. Those of Razer offer an amplitude of 9 cm, an interesting value. Iskur also allows you to change the angle of the armrest as well as its distance from the bust. Finally, the last adjustment is the one that is too often missing: that of the depth. Backing up or forwarding the armrest allows you to stand at the right distance from your desk.

    Size

    It seems that so-called ” gaming ” chairs have a hard time escaping the bucket seat look. The Razer Iskur is no exception, as is the Secretlab Titan or the Rekt Ultim8.before her. The Iskur file is therefore very high and enveloping. Once again, the returns on each side of the bust will be awkward for the larger body types. The backrest goes up to the shoulders, which is a good thing to ensure good support, even for people up to six feet tall.

    However, the presence of a headrest is not necessarily recommended. The latter hinders certain movements and can lead to neck and headaches over time. We advise you not to permanently use the cushion provided to limit the risk of pain.

    Construction

    Razer has taken great care in the finishes and build quality of its chair. The Iskur benefits from a serious assembly, in particular at the level of the imitation leather parts which have good stitching, essential to the life of the seat. The plastics used for the armrests and the adjustment levers give full confidence.

    Razer Iskur review-2

    The imitation leather covering that covers the seat and the backrest also seems to be of good quality. However, it is more complicated to assess its aging over time. The choice of imitation leather rather than fabric can be debated. The first is less messy and less sensitive to stains, the second more breathable.

    The metal leg is in line with the rest of the chair. The five casters are satisfactory and allow the Razer chair to move easily and rather silently.

    Conclusion

    The Razer Iskur is definitely an interesting and comfortable chair. Its lumbar adjustment is not the best thought out, but the backrest remains comfortable without it. The Razer gaming chair benefits from very good finishes and is comfortable. However, if you are over 1.85m tall or have a rather wide body, Iskur may be too narrow for you. Better then to turn to the XL versions of the Secretlab Titan.

    More information about razer 

     

  • Logitech Rally Bar Review : an all-in-one video conferencing

    logitech rally bar

    For almost a year and the start of the health crisis, many of us have been working from our homes. Thanks in particular to the latest webcams and headsets, we have been able to organize many meetings and online training during the past year. Faced with urgent demand, manufacturers have worked diligently on innovations to make remote working more enjoyable and efficient. Thus, Logitech has developed a solution that adapts to changing work patterns.

    TEST | Logitech Rally Bar: What are the advantages of the all-in-one video conferencing system?

    As a partner of Logitech, we were able to test the Logitech Rally Bar exclusively at our premises before the official launch of sales. Here we present the main features as well as the novelties.

    Get ready to go back to the office with Logitech!

    The last few months have shown that teleworking is possible and works – but unfortunately not permanently. Logitech has created a solution that combines the advantages of digital work and face-to-face interaction: the Logitech Rally Bar.

    The video conferencing system all-in-one Logitech :

    1. Can accommodate up to 12 people .
    2. Is easy to set up , configure and use.
    3. Automatically moves the lens and adjusts the zoom .
    4. Adapts to the lighting conditions of the room.
    5. Reduces unwanted noise

     

    See Also : Razer Kiyo Pro High End Webcame Review

     

    Connoisseurs will notice that at this point an all-in-one system with the Logitech MeetUp conference camera is already available and therefore this is nothing new. That is why we compared the two systems with the questions most frequently asked by our customers.

    • Available colors graphite and white
    • Built-in microphones 6
    • Integrated speakers 2
    • Image resolution 4K, 14K, 1440p, 1080p, 900p, 720p and SD at 30 frames per second
    • Zoom 15x HD zoom, 5x optical,
    • 3x digital (coming soon with the next software update)
    • Room detection fields 132.1 ° horizontal 82.2 ° vertical
    • Speaker output 90 dB SPL at 1 W 99 dB SPL at 8.0 W +/- 2 dB each at half volume
    • Audio range 4.5 m
    • Entrances 1x HDMI
    • 3x USB 3.0 Typ A
    • 1x USB Typ C
    • Exits 2x HDMI
    • 1x External microphone output

    Hard disk encryption AES128
    Data encryption Symmetrical, ICP

    Adapted accessories for more efficient meetings
    With Logitech accessories, you can set up your Rally Bar in the meeting room aesthetically and conveniently . In addition to the various supports and the corresponding microphones, Logitech offers the famous Tap Controller. With it, the equipment is always on site and you start your meetings quickly – without having to plug in a laptop or tablet repeatedly and overwhelmingly.

    Conclusion

    In recent months, digital work has made huge strides. More and more companies have realized that it is possible to work and learn effectively through telecommuting, online meetings, online training and more.

    The possibility of working from home will (hopefully) be maintained in the future. Enable employees to collaborate from anywhere, be it their home or office. This is where the Logitech Rally Bar comes in and helps you in your day-to-day work when it comes to bringing together large teams.

    The Logitech Rally Bar is ideal for medium sized rooms from around 20m² and up to 12 people. The included accessories are enough to simply connect the Rally Bar to the existing display, plug it into the laptop and immediately start your meeting. Stay efficient with Logitech!

    Logitech Software

    Logitech G Hub about logitech G hub

    Download software logitech

  • Review HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro Gaming Headset

    Hyperx Cloud Alpa

    Review | HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro Gaming Headset

    The HyperX Cloud line is a great success. Allowing the HyperX brand to become an icon on the competitive gaming scene for years to come. It all started with HyperX Cloud, then Cloud Cloud, Revolver was launched and the rest is history. They never fail to impress us in our review and here we are again with another model. Introducing the HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro Gaming Headset.

    The HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro Gaming Headset is a step up from previous HyperX Cloud models. Under the luxury shell, HyperX finally introduced a dual-chamber design for drivers. Basically this means less distortion and better separation between frequency range

    Technical Spesification

    The HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro gaming headset features a pair of 53mm dynamic drivers with 65 ohms impedance. It is a closed-over-the-ear design with a nominal frequency response of 13Hz to 27KHz. Better frequency range than previous models.

    Design

    The design elements of the HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro Gaming Headset are a tribute to the original. Something that the HyperX Cloud Revolver failed to capture, or at least tried to shoot down. It’s a sleeker design, with an emphasis on shaving weight. That said, the HyperX Cloud Apha Pro weighs in at 298 grams without the cables. About 22 grams lighter than the original . I just hope that in the near future HyperX will release a Cloud Alpha with more color options and a model without a matte finish.

    The headband is still based on a flexible design with a HyperX logo emblazoned on a stitched synthetic leather. The padding of the HyperX Alpha Pro is about half an inch, enough to provide a comfortable fit and evenly distributed weight.

     

    See Also : Roccat Syn Pro Air Headset Gaming

     

    Construction

    The fillings, on the other hand, are based on half-inch-thick memory foam pads. The dual controller cameras are hidden by mesh filters, although they are quite thin. Not that I’m complaining, but those with bigger ears can. Since this is a follow-up to the cloud models, it does not feature a rotating ear cup design .The microphone is a step up from those included with previous HyperX Cloud models. It is also fast and flexible like the rest, perhaps a little more flexible.

    HyperX decided to go with a proprietary connection for both 3.5mm ports. These aren’t bad, considering the strength needed to combat cable kink. The HyperX Cloud line is a great success. Allowing the HyperX brand to become an icon on the competitive gaming scene for years to come. It all started with HyperX Cloud, then Cloud Cloud, Revolver was launched and the rest is history. They never fail to impress us in our review and here we are again with another model. Introducing the HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro Gaming Headset.

    Comfort

    The HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro Gaming Headset is a step up from previous HyperX Cloud models. Under the luxury shell, HyperX finally introduced a dual-chamber design for drivers. Basically this means less distortion and better separation between frequency ranges. HyperX opted to use detachable cables with a TRRS 1.3 cable as the main one with the control box. It is compatible with mobile devices and consoles, while the longer dual audio output 2 cable is for the PC. Well thought out packages we have here. Simple, but impressive.

    SOFTWARE:

    There is no software included with the HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro gaming headset. In fact, most HyperX gears don’t come with any, which is in line with their brand philosophy geared towards competitiveness and simplicity. If it is not necessary, then you will not see any.

    CONFIGURATION OF THE TEST AND METHODOLOGY:

    Our test setup is based on a system with a Realtek ALC892 codec, tuned to generate a flat sound signature. On the other hand, the performance of the microphone is also evaluated by the same audio solution sampled in a 34dB environment. The helmet used for cross-reference sampling is a SONY MDR-7506 Studio Headphones – an ideal studio monitor for A / B testing. Note that we keep the sound pressure level around 85dBA for the duration of testing. Our main goals are to detail the games and the overall performance of the helmet.

    AUDIO PERFORMANCE TARGET:

    The hatters, while mostly subjectively tested, could still be tested for basic objective measurements. Helping us do just that are headphones and earphones from AudioCheck.net Benchmarking Archives Test .

    Based on AudioCheck.net test files, HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro gaming headsets were successfully streamed in most test suites. In particular, the dynamic range at 54 dB below full scale. That’s a great brand for those who play in a noisy environment.

    GENERAL AUDIO PERFORMANCE:

    The lower frequency ranges of the HyperX Cloud Alpha present an excellent presentation of subwoofers and low mids, with a good upper limit; Avoiding complications with the lower middle ranges. The quality and quantity of bass definitely improved with the HyperX Cloud Alpha compared to previous models.

    With a separate camera, the mid-range performance also saw improvements. Vocal-emphasized tracks are flawless to listen to, which is rare enough for gaming headsets. But again, we are looking at the HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro here. The direct descendant of the legendary lineup.

    The highs are not as bright as the previous models, however, we cannot say that the final details are lacking. It felt good, good or home to be precise.

    GAME PERFORMANCE:

    Immersive and competitive level performance is what we are looking for when it comes to gaming headsets. With that in mind, we launched our favorite games with the HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro. That includes Battlefield 4, an old game, yet it is not far behind when it comes to audio and positional details

    Image is where we examine the spatial location of audio sources. It is important for music and it is also important in games, where positional audio is king. Laterally and in depth, the images are enhanced with the HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro. That is with reference to the older models. I’ve already praised what came before the Alpha Pro, but this is on another level of detail. A must see if you have the older couple.

    MICROPHONE PERFORMANCE:

    Microphone performance is another major benefit of HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro. Expect with a specified frequency range of 50Hz to 18KHz. If it is possible for you to have a sexy IRL voice, then it should be heard flawlessly on the receiving end.

    Noise cancellation is quite excellent. I should have recorded the above test in a 34dBA environment but we actually did it in a 52dBA environment. That is during rush hour traffic.

    WRAPPING IT UP:

    The HyperX Cloud Alpha Pro gaming headset is anything but irrational. It may not have 7.1 surround but it is in all respects a better option than some Dolby Surround headphones at the same price. Microphone quality is another aspect of HyperX Cloud Pro that we liked. It’s definitely an upgrade from the old one with better range and noise-canceling properties.

    HyperX Software Support

    Software Support

  • Cooler Master Hyper 212 Black Edition REVIEW

    Cooler Master Hyper 212

    Cooler Master Hypwer 212 Black Edition

    All-in-one liquid cooling systems, more commonly known as AIO, are on the rise these days. However, there are still a few users who swear by Aircooling to calm the ardor of their processor. We have others who have had some setbacks with their AIO and come back to the right cooler, because at least, with this kind of product, we don’t have to worry about any mechanical problem related to the pump or a possible liquid leak, certainly much rarer.

    With an Aircooling cooling system, the only moving element is the fan and it is not difficult to change it in case of failure of the latter. Cooler Mastercontinues to offer these devices in Aircooling and today, we are going to focus on the Hyper series representing the entry level.

    In order to bring its Hyper 212 up to date, Cooler Master plays the design card. Not by modifying the structure of the radiator, but “simply” by dressing it in black and taking care of the finish at the level of its last fin. The result is stunning ! Especially if we refer to the look of the Hyper 212 Evo much more banal. We had not had the opportunity to test the other versions of this Hyper 212. To believe that we were waiting for this Black Edition series!

    Let’s go !!!

    Characteristics Cooler Master Hyper 212 Black Edition

    The Hyper 212 Black Edition takes place in a box with the brand’s favorite colors, namely charcoal black and especially purple. On the main face, we have the photo of the cooler taken 3/4 in order to appreciate the new clothing that the radiator covers.

    The specifications Cooler Master Hyper 212 Black Edition

    • Ventirad Hyper 212 Black Edition
    • Overall dimensions (H x W x D) 158.8 x 123 x 77 mm
    • Weight with fan 651 g
    • Material Copper (base and heat pipes), Aluminum (fins) black nickel coating
    • Heat pipes 4 heat pipes of 6 mm
    • Compatibility Intel 20xx / 115x / 1366/775
    • AMD AM2, AM2 +, AM3, AM3 +, AM4, FM1, FM2, FM2 +
    • Fan
    • Model Silencio FP120
    • Dimensions 120 x 120 x 25
    • Speed 650 – 2000 (+/- 10%)
    • Air flow 42 CFM (71.35 m3 / h)
    • Static pressure 2.9 mm H2O
    • Amperage 0.16 A
    • Power 1.92 W
    • Socket 4-pins (PWM)
    • Cable Black wires, flat profile

    Related Post : Software Driver and Manual guide for Hyper 212

    The fan :

    The Hyper 212 Black Edition is equipped with a unique fan which is none other than the Silencio FP120 of the brand. It is dressed all in black to match the sober look of this new cooler. However, Cooler Master also offers an RGB version with the installation of a completely different fan: SF120R RGB. The frame remains classic with its square shape and rounded corners.

    Cooler Master Hyper 212

    In order to ensure good air flow through the radiator fins, our Silencio FP120 is somewhat boosted and has a maximum speed that goes up to 2000 rpm instead of the 1400 rpm of the box version. The Cooler Master logo is transcribed on the label as well as the electrical characteristics: 0.16 A or a power of 1.92 W.

    The reinforcing branches of the frame are rectilinear. The bearing is of the Loop Dynamic Bearing type, not to say Fluid Dynamic Bearing, but the brand wants to be personalized. We have a classic thickness of 25mm. In the center of the blades : nothing! You have to know how to remain discreet when you display a name like that of Black Edition.

    Silent Operation

    The Silencio FP120 has only 5 blades. Large blades with a particular design that seems to plunge the distal part as far as possible. This shape gives the fan a higher static pressure while reducing the sound level. In addition, the motor uses the patented “Silent Driver IC” technology which helps to limit vibrations, thus generating less noise pollution.

    However, Cooler Master compensates for this absence of silent bloc by placing 4 small adhesive rubber washers on the face in contact with the radiator. Hence, also, the presence of an additional game in the bundle for a possible second fan. The space between the two faces is left free and it is preferable that this be the case since the metal fastener takes place at this level. We note the presence of a plastic part that reinforces the structural rigidity.

    4 wires emerge from the electronic board and follow one of the branches of the frame which has small pins to guide the cable. Black in color, the wires are glued to each other to present a flat profile. The cable measures 300 mm and ends with a 4-pin socket attesting to the presence of PWM management. The rotation speed ranges from 650 to 2000 rpm with a margin of +/- 10%. The maximum speed generates an air flow of 42 CFM, or 71.35 m3 / h and a static pressure of 2.9 mm H2O.

    The cooler

    The radiator comes in the tower format with no less than 55 aluminum fins in which 4 heat pipes take the shape of a U. As can be seen in this front view, the branches of the heat pipes are distributed over two levels in edge of the radiator, making the most of the air flow generated by the fan. It measures 123mm wide by 158.8mm high.

    Cooler Master Hyper 212

    The small novelty in this Black Edition version is the presence of an aluminum plate which covers all of these fins.
    This plate is fixed by two hexagon screws. It also ensures an excellent finish to the entire radiator, concealing at the same time the often unsightly termination of the heat pipes. In addition, the black anodized aluminum has a brushed appearance, very classy!

    We are far from the somewhat basic look of the Hyper 212 EVO. It is clear that our cooler offers a whole other much more stylish appearance, like what a little black and a nice finish on the top turns you into a radiator. In the center comes the Cooler Master logo with a metallic appearance. On the ventilated faces, the edge of the fins is not rectilinear, but has a small notch near the corners. On the sides, we have two grooves where the metal clips are housed.

    Expected Performances?

    A groove for each fan, since the Hyper 212 Black Edition can optionally be fitted with a second fan to switch the cooler to Push / Pull. While the top plate is in black anodized aluminum, the rest of the radiator structure is plated with black nickel, both at the level of the various fins and the heat transfer tubes. The brand spoils us! We are tempted to say that it is really nickel!

    A film protects the base of the radiator. As it is stipulated in English. It is imperative to remove the film, before installing the Hyper 212 Black Edition on the processor at the risk of not having the expected performances

    Once removed, we discover a Direct Touch type base. The 4 heat pipes, 6 mm in diameter copper, are then machined so as to obtain a completely flat surface in order to be in direct contact with the IHS of the processor. The black nickel plating is extended at this level.

    Cooler Master Hyper 212

    The structure Hyper 212

    The heat pipes fit into a block of anodized aluminum. The structure of the latter incorporates two extensions with a hole to ensure the assembly of the fixing plates specific to the different Sockets. In addition, the upper part of this aluminum structure has been milled in order to obtain small fins which will take advantage of the air flow in order to dissipate the heat accumulated by direct contact with the processor.

    The heat pipes are immersed in the various fins and are positioned, in groups of two, with a slight offset between them to make the most of the air flow.

    We never tire of contemplating the radiator from all angles. We set up the Silencio FP120 fan. As we can see, the clip takes place between the two sides of the frame. A detail to take into account if ever you want to change the fan, at this time you must ensure that the space at this level is free.

    Hyper 212 Black Edition is complete

    The metal fastener has a crenellated profile so as to be partially housed in the notch generated by the edge of the fins. We may have to wonder if the clip really holds well in the groove, because the steel rod does not want to stay in its seat. You have to press the clip to ensure it is correctly positioned.

    On the other hand, it is strange that the RGB version benefits from a fastening system almost identical to that of the Evo , made up of two plastic structures screwed onto the fan and which are then clipped onto the grooves. With the fan mounted on the radiator, we go from 51mm to 77mm. The total measurement takes into account the presence of the rubber washers . The weight with the fan is 653 g.

    Once the Hyper 212 Black Edition is complete, we notice that Cooler Master plays on shades of gray. The black fan is, moreover, devoid of any sticker. The upper plate has a more “Gun Metal” color, enhanced by its brushed appearance and the presence of the brand’s logo.

    Sober and classy at the same time! Much more “modern” than the Evo version, the Hyper 212 Black Edition can also switch to a slightly more fun style. Indeed, Cooler Master declines its new cooler in an RGB version .

    Mounting : Socket 115x

    We start by equipping the radiator with its two fixing plates specific to the Intel Socket. They take place above the extensions of the radiator base structure. They have in their center a tapped hole of type M3, the thread of the two small screws included in the bundle.

    These take position under the extension. We like the fact that the mounting point can accommodate the thickness of the screw head, the little detail that polishes the finish of the cooler. The screw is tightened while paying attention that the fixing plate takes its place at the bottom of its housing. The two plates are attached to the base of the radiator.

    At each end, we have a spring-loaded screw that fits into an elongated hole. More than a single hole, these are three contiguous holes corresponding to the different centers of Intel Sockets. The screw cannot pass from one hole to another without our exerting a small maneuver. We notice that the screw has a groove, of a narrower diameter, just above its thread.

    We now need to equip the backplate. The long, narrow branch is for the Intel Socket, the wider branch is for the AMD Socket. We slide the fixing screw so that its rectangular head takes place in the hollow structure. This prevents the screw from turning on itself when installing the spacer.

    Good Material

    In order to keep the screw securely in place within the backplate, we use the specific plastic cap for the Intel Socket. At the base of the branch of the backplate, we note the presence of three notches on one of which the cap is clipped. Each of these notches corresponds to one of the centers of the different Intel Sockets.

    We have just placed the cap at the level of the first row and we can see that the screw is not yet supported by the structure of this cap. The goal is for the screw to hold a middle position, for our Socket 115x, within the oblong-shaped attachment point. The simplest method is to push in the cap so that it jams the shank of the screw.

    While maintaining the radiator with one hand so that the base remains in good contact with the processor, we begin to tighten the various screws, one turn by turn, following a cross pattern. This makes it possible to keep the base of the radiator parallel to the processor during the tightening phase.

    Black on black, it is much more sober and classier with this Black Edition version than to see the silver gray aspect of the aluminum, coupled with the orange color of the copper heat pipes, hovering above the motherboard. Doesn’t Cooler Master come to walk on the beds of a certain German brand? Especially since it comes with solid financial arguments.

    Sound level

    The sound level is measured using a sound level meter placed on a stand 25 cm from the fan (the breath directed in the opposite direction). The readings are made at different voltages applied to the fan (s) via a rheobus and checked by a multimeter. This rheobus allows us, at the same time, to know the speed of rotation as a function of the applied voltage.

    Not only does the Hyper 212 Black Edition allow itself to “take” the color codes of the German brand, but in addition, the cooler knows how to be also discreet! Certainly, it has only one fan, but at least its discretion remains assured even at full speed and as much to say that at its lowest speed, it becomes inaudible.

    Temperature measurement

    The Hyper 212 Black Edition does not have to be ashamed of the competition at least when the ventilation is running at full speed. At low speed, it gives way and this state will be preferred when using the PC in office or multimedia.

    With the overclocked processor, it does its job as long as you stay with the fan running at maximum speed. Remember that even at this speed, the Hyper 212 Black Edition remains relatively discreet.

    Cooler Master has done a nice makeover job on his Hyper 212, a certain Cristina would be blissful. No, frankly, there is nothing to say about the new look of this cooler which becomes much classier, more refined (like Cooler Master calls it on his website), his counterpart the Hyper X 212.

    We appreciate the finish, especially with this brushed aluminum plate which covers all the fins and conceals the end of the often unsightly heat pipes.

    We may be surprised by the fact that Cooler Master passes on metal fasteners while the other Hyper 212 benefit from a clip-on fastening system. What we greatly appreciate is the fact that the brand does not revise the price upwards!

    A price identical to that of the Hyper 212 X with its silver and copper outfit, or even that of the Hyper 212 LED. Cooler Master also offers an LED version on the Black Edition for 10 euros more. Despite a low price, the bundle is very complete with a syringe of MasterGel Pro thermal paste and above all the necessary to install a second fan.

    Indeed, the brand provides a second set of metal clips, rubber washers and even a Y adapter. In order to connect the two fans to the CPU_Fan socket on the motherboard.

    Conclusion:

    The fastening system requires several steps, but it remains simple and effective. In addition, the accessories follow the trend of the Black Edition and abandon their chrome appearance. Compatibility is assured with all current Sockets except the TR4, but hey, we understand the reason.

    We are just a little skeptical about the proper fixing of the fan as the steel rod of the clamp will not want to hold its position at the bottom of the notch. A point to watch out for if you do not want to find the fan on the ground, the key is to press down on the clip to ensure it is correctly positioned.

    The tower format of the Hyper 212 Black Edition does not interfere with the installation of the memory modules, the fan positioning itself neatly before the first slot. The sonic performance is top notch with the Silencio FP120 fan which remains quiet even at full throttle. Suffice to say that at low speed it disappears from our sound detection field.

    Faced with our 7700k, the temperatures are very correct as long as we let the fan move its blades at full speed. However, it loses ground when this speed is reduced to its minimum and this state will be favored during office or multimedia use of the PC.

    Positive points (+)

    • Rate
    • Look
    • Finish
    • Sound level
    • Easy assembly
    • Sound level
    • 12 V performance
    • 100% memory compatibility
    • Bundle

    The negative points (-)

    • Slow speed receding performance
    • Fan fixing