Category: Gaming

  • Razer Huntsman v2 Analog Review Software Manual Guide

    Razer Huntsman v2
    Razer Huntsman v2 Analog

    New Flagship Gaming Keyboard Razer Huntsman v2 Analog

    Despite all of their different design , keyboards have felt static for years. Razer is set to change that with the new Huntsman V2 Analog. This new flagship gaming keyboard uses optical switches to provide joystick-like control in gaming.

    This is an innovative variant that combines keyboard and controller support into one premium package that can change the way you play. But at $ 249, these upgrades don’t come cheap. Do these innovations justify the high price? Let’s take a closer look and find out.

    Razer Huntsman V2 Analog – Design & Features

    The Huntsman V2 Analog should immediately sound familiar to anyone who has been following Razer’s keyboards over the past few years. The V2 Analog is a full-size keyboard and almost identical to last year’s Razer BlackWidow V3 Pro.  Which itself was extremely similar to the Razer Huntsman Elite launched in 2018.

    See Also : Logitech K750 Keyboard Perfect For Typing? Detail Review

     

    It has an excellent multi-function dial and multimedia controls at the above the numeric keypad, and the same sleek matte black deshfrance adopted by all major. Razer keyboards. And yes, it’s Chroma enabled, because what’s a Razer keyboard without a bit of RGB customization?

    I’m happy to say that with this release Razer seems to have done everything ked-out with the BlackWidow V3 Pro and Huntsman Eliteand improved on many other things.

    Feel Good for Razer Huntsman

    The board is heavy which immediately makes it more premium and sits impeccably on my desk. It features Razer’s excellent doubleshot PBT keycaps that feel and sound great (albeit a bit loud, which is becoming a hallmark of Huntsman keyboards) while keeping the light well insulated behind the legends.

    It comes with an upgraded leatherette wrist rest which is by far the best looking I have ever seen that comes with a keyboard. It’s magnetic, snaps into place so quickly, and removes unsightly bezels from the BlackWidow V3 Pro. Razer also included an upgraded USB relay port which clap uses USB 3.0. Finally, you can use one with a USB stick and get decent transfer speeds.

    Strangely, this resulted in the biggest wiring harness I’ve ever seen with a gaming keyboard. Instead of having a thicker cable with two ends like most with a passthrough, it has two separate cables, each braided. And quite stiff out of the box. I was able to use the included wrap to keep this somewhat manageable, but there’s no getting around the mess for cable management.

    Like Expect?

     

    As you would expect from a Razer flagship, everything is RGB stuff, and it looks awesome. The Huntsman V2 Analog uses individual LEDs under each key, as well as under the multifunction dial and media keys.

    More strikingly, it brings back the wraparound RGB band from the Huntsman Elite, and which also includes the wrist rest. Using a series of POGO pins at the bottom of the board, the keyboard is able to power the palm rest and sync lighting effects under light.

    All of this is easily personalized in Synapse or by selecting a preset or customizing your own intricate effect. If you are not sold in RGB, you will probably find that the illumination of the wrist rest is excessive

    Downside for Razer Huntsman

    The downside to these double-hit PBT keycaps is that they reduce the overall brightness of the card. In a well lit room, the backlighting of the keys seems dim. The underlight is a bit brighter but remains quite dim in normal lighting.

    This is not the keyboard to choose if you prefer a splash of color around your keys. Instead, its well insulated lighting looks a lot more intentional. The keys also have a lightly textured surface that feels great under my fingers while playing.

    Since they’re double-injected PBTs, they won’t shine or have the legends scratched off over time, and should look just as good after several. Years of heavy use they do it right away.

    The real magic of this keyboard is what happens under these keys. The Huntsman line, unlike Razer’s BlackWidow series, uses optical switches.

    Switch For Razer Huntsman

    Unlike a traditional mechanical key switch, there are no mechanical contacts that wear out over time. Instead, a beam of light is projected under each switch. When the key is pressed, the beam of light hits a sensor and triggers a key press. Optical switches are inherently more responsive, eliminating electrical interference known as debounce delay. And less prone to failure due to wear and tear on their internal components.

    The Huntsman V2 Analog builds on this system to provide full analog control to each optical switch on the keyboard. In other words, each key is capable of providing the nuanced control of a joystick or trigger on a controller.

    Normal switches operate in the “on” or “off” states. The key is “on” when pressed and “off” when not, with nothing in between. Here, Razer’s new analog switches are able to measure exactly how hard the key is pressed to provide depth sensing, just like the sticks on a controller.

    This has a few unique advantages

    The first is, of course, analog control. Press the key lightly, your character walks, a little harder and he jogs, and harder still, he runs. A car in Grand Theft Auto can go halfway and go full speed the rest of the descent. If you’re a fan of racing or stealth games, you’re probably already playing with a controller for more nuanced control.

    The Huntsman offers a similar capability, while still being able to aim with your mouse and have the rest of the keyboard close at hand.

    Likewise, depth detection allows the keyboard to perform other interesting tricks. Since it can distinguish half a push from a full push, you can tie an action to each, with what Razer calls two-step actuation.

    This system basically lets you have two keys in one, increasing your responsiveness in games. Switching to a grenade with half a push and throwing it with a full is a prime example. But I also found it useful to link two single key zoom stages when running like a sniper. It’s a cool system but requires you to get a little creative and take the time to program what works for your own playstyle.

    Customizable Support

    The ability to sense depth allows the Huntsman to support customizable actuation points. Out of the box, the keys are set to operate at 1.5mm. Although the new switches have more resistance than previous Razer’s linear optics, I still found this too sensitive and recomposed it to 2mm.

    Inside Synapse, the actuation point can be adjusted up to 3.6mm and synchronized with one click with all keys. It might seem like a small feature, but it’s one of the most meaningful in everyday life. Basically lets you have the responsiveness of a speed switch while gaming and the precision of a traditional switch with everything else.

    The first version of the software I used had a weird issue that sometimes detected a second keyboard when none were connected. Like all Razer keyboards, the programming takes place inside Razer Synapse but here it is essentially a requirement. For games, analog control works by associating controller commands with individual keys. WASD would be mapped to joystick movement, for example, or triggers if you place a racing game. Without Synapse, the Huntsman V2 Analog functions like a standard optical gaming keyboard.

    Razer Huntsman V2 Analog – Performance

    On paper, the Huntsman V2 Analog makes a lot of bold promises, and for the most part it works well. Being able to sneak into Shadow of the Tomb Raider or wander the streets of Red Dead Redemption 2 felt very natural, controller-like, but not quite.

    Likewise, jumping into a car in Grand Theft Auto Online and getting around town worked well and felt very natural over time. I also loved getting creative with the dual action shooters controls. In Call of Duty Warzone, mapping Run to a gentle press and sprint to a full press of W was natural and intuitive.

    Getting to know it was easy, but there was more of a learning curve than I expected. I had to make a fair amount of adjustment to get the sensitivity just right. Even though the functionality is similar to that of a controller, the point is that each key has only 3.6 millimeters of total travel.

    Functionality

    It’s much less than a joystick or trigger, and it’s much harder to be precise about how far each key is pressed. To remedy this, Razer lets you adjust the sensitivity of each key – but there’s no getting past the lighter touch and the time it takes to get used to it.

    Taken as a whole, however, the Huntsman V2 Analog is an exceptionally good gaming keyboard. Keyswitches are smooth and responsive, and the analog functionality has no impact on the actual feel of the keys.

    The extra resistance does, however, and I would consider these keys among the best feel keys I’ve ever used in a gaming keyboard. The extra weight of the keys also helps in learning to use its analog functions.

    very satisfaction?

    The multifunction dial continues to be excellent, and the ability to map controls to its rotations and buttons makes it useful for more than just gaming. I especially liked it in Creative apps, where I was able to map shortcuts to quickly navigate a timeline or adjust tools.

    The only thing I don’t like is the height of the media control buttons. If you’re tempted to pinch the button instead of rolling it to the side. You’ll quickly find the Skip Track button on the way.

    Use the keyboard

    During several days in gaming sessions lasting several hours. I was also satisfied with the ease of use of the keyboard. The wrist rest is plush and at the perfect height to support my palms and avoid straining my wrist while typing.

    The leatherette I tended to make my palms sweat, however. I would like to see a perforated option available in the future. Best gaming keyboards

    Gaming keyboards come in all shapes and sizes, and your needs can play a huge role in which keyboard ends up being the right one for you. We’ve tested a wide range of keyboard types to see which ones really stand out as champions in different categories.

    Software Razer for Huntsman v2 analog

    Manual Guide Driver and software hunstman v2 analog

  • Asus GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Expedition review

    Asus GeForce GTX 1050

    Classic, but very discreet

    If Asus tends to offer premium graphics cards, equipped with high-end home heatsinks called DirectCU, the company also offers less upscale models. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Expedition is one of these entry-level models, which doesn’t prevent it from being quite interesting in practice.

    The cooling system used here does not have a specific name. The radiator is quite basic since it is simply a piece of extruded aluminum.

    Cooling System

    This radiator is in direct contact with the graphics chip and only this one. The power supply stage as well as the memory do not benefit from any dissipation aid. Two fans with double ball bearings are responsible for cooling the block.

    Asus is once again using its 0dB technology here, which cuts off the fans when the card is idle. Working passively when no game is running, the card activates its ventilation when the GPU temperature rises above 55 ° C.

    You must then strain your ears to hear the very slight breath produced by the two fans. We are here facing an ultra discreet card and this does not come at the expense of the temperature of the chip which is maintained at 68 ° C.

    Factory frequencies and manual “overclocking”.

    This GTX 1050 Ti Expedition is a non factory overclocked model which therefore operates at conventional frequencies. The GPU is thus announced at 1290 MHz base and at 1392 MHz via GPU Boost.

     

    See Also : Cooler Master  Hyper  212 Black Edition Review

     

    After more than an hour of non-stop gaming , the effective frequency of the GPU oscillates between 1533 and 1645 MHz. The frequency of the 4 GB of GDDR5 memory is for its part at 1,752 MHz.

    As this is a card without a PCIe power connector, overclocking is necessarily very quickly limited by power consumption. We were thus able to reach a little over 1700 MHz for the GPU and not far from 2000 MHz for the memory.

    We will have to wait to test a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti equipped with a PCIe power connector to really see what the GPU has in its belly.

    Performance in games

     

    In games, this GeForce GTX 1050 Ti sits halfway between AMD’s Radeon RX 460 and Radeon RX 470. The first is ahead of 47% on average while the second maintains a lead of 34%.

    This model also performs better than unoverclocked GeForce GTX 960s OC models will then be matched. This ultimately allows you to play in Full HD without making too big a compromise, and in high quality.

    Power Consumption

    The power consumption of this model is very low since it is a question of 60 watts on average for the card alone. We thus gain 20 to 25 watts compared to the GeForce GTX 950 customs and, above all, we are at half of what a GTX 960 consumes.

    Not surprisingly, energy efficiency is there and shines at a very high level. This is without comparison with what AMD offers opposite, both with its Radeon RX 460 and its Radeon RX 470.

    Utility For GTX 1050

    The PCB used is quite large, although it has few components. The power supply stage is made up of three phases for the GPU and one phase for the graphics memory. Our test copy produced a moderate coilwhine (coil whistle). No PCIe power cord is needed. Three video outputs are present an HDMI 2.0b, a DisplayPort 1.4 and a DVI.

    The box contains a CD containing an overclocking utility and a graphics driver. Better to download the latest versions from the respective sites of Asus and Nvidia. There is also a quick start guide and a voucher for 15 days of Premium access to World of Warships. The warranty is 3 years.

    STRONG POINTS

    • Very discreet in games.
    • Fans off at rest.

    WEAK POINTS

    • No heatsink on the power supply and memory stage.

    CONCLUSION

    Used to premium graphics cards that offer a whole host of options, Asus shows that it is able to deliver quality entry level models as well. If it is not overclocked, this model is extremely quiet, without neglecting the cooling of the chip, maintained at a suitable temperature.

    • asus geforce gtx 1050 ti cerberus
    • asus geforce gtx 1050 ti cerberus review
    • nvidia asus geforce gtx 1050 ti 4gb
    • nvidia asus geforce gtx 1050 ti
    • asus nvidia geforce gtx 1050 ti
    • asus cerberus geforce gtx 1050 ti

     

  • Razer Blade 15 Gaming Laptop High End : Test and Review

    razer-blade-15
    razer-blade-15-gaming-laptop

    High end portable gaming PC

    If there is one manufacturer name that every gaming enthusiast should know, it is Razer ! Evolving in the high end environment, Razer prices admittedly high, but reflecting the intrinsic values of its products like the famous Blade 15 , a gaming laptop with superior technical characteristics, and that you can modulate in to some extent.

    Find now the presentation as well as our full test.

    Due to its popularity, the model is available in many specialty stores and even in some supermarkets. However, to save time and effort, it is in your interest to go through an online shopping platform, which will also ensure that you receive the equipment in the best conditions.

     

    See Also : Xbox Series X test : Comfort And Power to Spare

     

    A PC dedicated to gaming!

    As a manufacturer evolving in this field, Razer had to offer an all in one solution, succeeding on all the essential points related to the practice of video games.

    Based on hardware and software solutions such as Windows 10, Intel Core or even Nvidia GeForce Series, it not only allows use for the most demanding video games of the generation, but also all applications requiring significant resources, such as livestream , animation or even video editing.

    Related Post : Acer Predator Helios 300 Test an Review

    A common base, several variants

    We were talking about a solution, but we actually find an Advanced Model the first released as well as a Base Model with less advanced features, but also at a more attractive price. For both versions, however, there is a unique base.

    Spesification

    • 15.6-inch full HD touchscreen 4K display, with IPS panel with thin edges (4.9mm)
    • NVDIA GeForce Series GTX or RTX graphics card
    • Intel Core i7 processor
    • Aluminum frame
    • Ultra-thin design: 1.68cm
    • Weight about 2kg
    • 16Gb RAM memory
    • A customizable RGB keyboard (Razer Chroma)
    • 3 USB-C connectors, 1 Thunderbolt USB-C port, one HDMI port, one MiniDisplay port
    • Bluetooth technology 5
    • Maximum battery life of 6 hours
    • 44 blade ventilation system with steam chamber
    • Dolby Atmos Microphone and Speakers
    • 1Mp webcam (720p resolution)

    You will have noticed: we have not detailed certain crucial points, such as storage, graphics card, processor or battery. Quite simply because it is on these points that the two variants make the difference!

    The differences between Razer Blade 15 Base Model and Advanced Model. The first version, also the most sophisticated the Advanced Model lets you choose between several cards: an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, RTX 2070 or RTX 2080 , all three of Max-Q design and incorporating Optimus technology.

    On this point, the Base Model, released more recently, directly embeds the GTX 1660 Ti VR. The processor also varies in newer versions, so the base model comes with an Intel iRNUM i7 (6-core) while the Advanced Model comes with an i7 Core Family. Note that if both are boosted by 16Gb RAM , the Base Model only allows an extension up to 32Gb, where the Advanced allows double, at 64Gb.

    Storage & battery

    On the storage side, several solutions are available to you within the two variants: you can opt for a configuration including an SSD and an HHD, of 128/256 and 1TB / 2TB depending on the configurations. You can also go for a blank slot for the HDD and focus on the SSD alone, pushing up to a 512GB SSD.

    Regarding the screen, the Advanced Model offers you the choice of upgrading for a higher refresh rate, at 144Hz against 60Hz for the base model. Customization options are also enhanced on the advanced model, which allows you to set the backlighting key by key where the basic model is single zone.

    The power of the battery increases consecutively in order to compensate for the increase in resources, rising to 80Wh against 65Wh for the base model, although this does not change the use, the maximum autonomy being always set at 6h.

    Summary of our opinion on the Razer Blade 15

    Aesthetic in presentation, formidable in use the Blade 15 dazzles us with its performance. If it compensates for its performance by heat spreading over the entire chassis, it remains high end, deploying an obvious quality of construction, perfect by elaborate finishes.

    Its attractive thin edges leave more room for the action, which you admire thanks to a formidable full HD touch screen. To return to the aestheticism of the product, the design of the Razer Blade 15 strongly reminds us of a Macbook Pro, which is a compliment given the importance of this point for the Apple brand.

    We love

    • Durable and solid construction; aluminum frame
    • The high-resolution screen with perfect colorimetry
    • CPU and GPU performance
    • Storage solutions
    • Autonomy, interesting for a varied use
    • Its perfect finishes and undeniable aesthetic qualities

    We like less

    • The average quality of the speakers
    • Default performance of the processor to calibrate
    • Significant heating that affects the entire chassis

    Our full review of the Razer Blade 15 gaming PC

    Now let’s go into the details of our test, point by point. Note that we are based on the basic version the Model Base but that we also have a word for the advanced model, performance side, when it is relevant.

    razer-blade-15-editing-video-gaming

    Frame and screen

    This is the point where Razer surprises us the most: the aluminum alloy and CNC chassis deploys tremendous strength and displays a high end look noticeable at first glance.

    We appreciate the manufacturer’s efforts to refine the computer as much as possible a true synonym of luxury by giving it slightly pronounced edges for a more generous display as well as a thickness of only 1.68cm.

    And believe our experience: When the discovery of this build quality is complete, your eyes will instantly be on the screen. And what a screen! Its 15.6-inch size allows for a good balance between mobility and display, deploying a full HD 1920 x 1080 IPS resolution.

    For refined colorimetry, each screen individually calibrated at the factory. Note, as indicated previously, that you can opt for a refresh at 60Hz or 144Hz.

    Most

    • Ultra-thin edges
    • High quality aluminum frame
    • Full HD and touch screen

    The lessers

    • Nothing to report

    Aesthetics and customization

    Not only is the whole thing good, but also aesthetic: the construction gives the Razer Blade a minimalist and modern look quite successful its finesse allowing it to assert itself, according to the manufacturer, as “the laptop world’s thinnest 15.6-inch gaming machine ”.

    The finishes are worked and the green color  emblematic of the manufacturer – covers the logo as well as the connectors and USB ports .

    But obviously what you want to hear about is of course the RGB backlighting. And there, as we told you, the choice is left to you  by zone or key by key. In either case, the Synapse software suite is complete and pretty well done, although we may regret a lack of intuitiveness during the first uses. It will therefore be necessary to go through tutorials or simply to rummage to manage to take it correctly in hand.

    Most

    • Fine worked and aesthetic edges
    • Graphic elements
    • Customizable backlighting

    The lessers

    • Synapse software takes some time to get started

    Performance

    The performance of the Intel CPU and the Nvidia GPU (processor and graphics card). As a gaming PC, this is obviously where we expect it the most! The performance of the graphics card is frankly well exploited by the device, offering maximum fluidity on games with advanced graphics. In Full HD, in-game performance is very fast for RTX ranges, with high levels of graphics.

    Thus, TomsHardware data reveals high fps in Ultra on games like World War Z or GTA 5 (with x8 anti-aliasing ). Although for the latter, the fps drop slightly below 60 for the RTX 2060. The performances remain all the same similar, since one notes on average 55-62fps, from the 2060 to the 2080.

    In 4K, for the same game, it will be preferable to lower the anti-aliasing to 2x while reducing the quality of the graphics to “high”. With this configuration, the fps are preserved around 55 to 66fps, again from 2060 to 2080. On the other hand, on a game like Far Cry 5, you will have to be content with normal graphics for FPS limited to 45-55fps. A point on which the Radeon VII is doing better.

    Inside GTX 1660

    If you are going to look to the GTX 1660 Ti for the Base Model, expect great performance in Full HD too. With around 70fps for The Witcher 3, Far Cry 5 and Battlefield V in Ultra, over 110fps for Wolfenstein II.

    In Ultra and x8 antialiasing, and even a solid 53fps for GTA in “very high” graphics quality and x4 antialiasing. In 2560 × 1440, obviously, performance drops, but remains very good for games like Battlefield V in ultra (nearly 50fps), Far Cry 5 in Ultra and HD textures (54fps) or The Witcher 3 in Ultra (54fps) .

    Configuration System

    Thus, depending on the configuration, the machine gets off handily. Without difficulties? Not so sure, because it compensates for its performance by a significant release of heat. And if we can not blame the ventilation system, relatively innovative, the fault is however on the chassis.

    This conducts heat over its entire surface, so that the keyboard can quickly become relatively hot at high performance. It may therefore be interesting to use an additional external ventilation solution to avoid the feeling of discomfort for the most intense parts.

    On the processor side, the Intel Core i7-9750H as well as the Intel Core i7 Family with their 6 cores are formidable in use and do not fail to confer speed and responsiveness to the computer. However, as Les Numériques points out in their dedicated test, it is necessary to use the Synapse software. Then to switch the processor from “balanced” to “creator” to observe an increase in performance, with a rate at 3.3GHz. against 2.9GHz for the default mode.

    Most

    • Excellent graphics card performance
    • No drop in FPS
    • Ray tracing enabled
    • Maximum use of screen

    The lessers

    • The entire surface of the chassis takes heat
    • You need to calibrate the processor via Synapse

    Software And Support

    Razer Blade 15 Software support driver and manual guide

    The performance of the speakers

    This is not necessarily the point that convinced us the most. Listening is indeed not very generous: the midrange, bass and bass thus have a significant range than on other devices of similar configuration. The design convinces us, on the other hand, more, since the manufacturer decides to place the speakers in frontdirectly. In order to enjoy sound directed directly to the user.

    An interesting choice, even if it does not allow to benefit from an exceptional rendering. The output power being however important, you can amply compensate in installation an external audio solution, such as a hi-fi or portable speaker. Which will allow you to compensate at the same time the low range of sound frequencies for the mediums and the bass.

    Most

    • Its directed to the user
    • High output power

    The lessers

    • Relative poverty of mediums and serious
    • The voices are a little high

    Nomadic or sedentary use?

    Let’s get it right a gaming PC is virtually dedicated to home use. Associating it with a portable format therefore represents a challenge that Razer succeeds relatively well here. With a reasonable weight of 2kg, it still carries a diet of nearly 700g. In short, for carrying in a satchel over a long distance this is not necessarily ideal but a backpack will do the trick. Likewise, depending on the duration of your trip, you will not necessarily have to take the power supply with you.

    The autonomy of 6.30 hours on average is frankly admirable for a gaming laptop, for classic Wi-Fi use. Internet browsing / optimal brightness. On the other hand, this drops if the refresh rate of your screen goes to 144Hz (against 60Hz). In which case you can count about thirty minutes less for autonomy.

    Obviously, in games, you can not expect a monster outfit, although this obviously depends on the resources that the game in question requires. For maximum performance, allow a maximum of 1 hour to 1:30 of play. In other words, avoid playing on battery power, except for the most economical games! Note, moreover, that it is possible for you to boost it. By reducing the brightness or by switching to “Airplane mode”, for example, you can expect an autonomy of more than 10 hours.

    Our final opinion on the Razer Blade 15

    If Razer is establishing itself as one of the most popular manufacturers in the business. It’s not for nothing and this model proves it to us without question. It dazzles us in all its variants, from the Advanced to the Base Model. Offering various solutions allowing to modulate both the components and the price. If this turns out to be high, let us note at the same time that the quality of construction as much as the performances justify it.

    Especially in a portable format, more expensive than the fixed equivalent for the same components, because requiring a microphone specific construction. Comfortable, it makes you want to use it both at home and outside. Which it allows to a certain extent thanks to its autonomy. There are still some possible improvements, especially with regard to heat conduction more than the cooling system. Which is successful as well as the quality of the speakers. Do not hesitate to compose with a speaker: the output power allows you to “spit out the decibels”!

    • razer blade 15 gaming performance
    • razer 15.6 blade 15 gaming notebook
    • Notebook razer 15.6 blade 15 gaming 2022
    • review razer blade 15 gaming laptop
  • Roccat Vulcan II Mini review

    Roccat Vulcan II Mini review

    GAMING SUPPORT –  The Roccat Vulcan II Mini keyboard and its very compact format. We can notably mention Razer with its Huntsman Mini and Blackwidow V3 Mini , SteelSeries with its Apex 9 and Pro Mini, the K65 RGB Mini and K70 Pro Mini Wireless from Corsair or even Fnatic and its Streak65 . Only Logitech G still seems a little behind, but we imagine that their model will not be long in coming.

    So with a little delay on the competition, can Roccat impose itself on this format more and more appreciated by the players? Response after a dozen days at his side.

    Design & Ergonomics

    The Vulcan II Mini generally takes up the design of the previous keyboards in the range and in particular the Vulcan and Vulcan TKL Pro that we had already had the opportunity to present to you on GamerTech.

    The look of these keyboards is clearly one of their main strengths, with the various iterations of the Vulcan standing out quite a bit from the competition thanks to an airy and slender design, emphasizing RGB lighting.

    The main novelty of this Mini version is thus found in its format, which as its name suggests now passes on a reduced model, here at 65%.

    As a reminder, this design, even more compact than that of the TKL models, ignores the numeric keypad and the F1 to F12 keys. Faced with the 60% models, on the other hand, we retain direct access to the directional arrows as well as to an additional column on the right of the keyboard.

    In practice, there is a tendency to favor this design at 65% rather than 60%. The difference in terms of dimensions is not huge and we gain in comfort of use as well as in productivity.

    Dimensions

    Once placed on a desk, the latest addition to the brand knows how to be discreet. With dimensions of 324 x 116 x 31 mm, the Roccat Vulcan II Mini adapts to the smallest spaces while providing a large sliding surface for mouse movements. An essential point if you are used to playing with low sensitivity. To give you a better idea, the animation below compares the Roccat model to a few other references that have already passed through our hands.

    A little more in detail, the finishes of the keyboard are similar to those of previous Vulcans. We thus find a chassis with an always very thin design, here reinforced by an aluminum upper plate. The model takes the torture pretty well despite a fairly light weight of 500 g.

    We also find these “floating”-looking keys, with these keycaps which only cover the upper part of the mechanical switches. It’s a bit of the hallmark of this Vulcan range and we must admit that visually the result is still just as convincing. Note that it is now possible to replace these keycaps with more traditional models if desired (cross stem).

    Regarding the keycaps installed by default, Roccat does not specify their design but everything seems to lead to believe that they are ABS plastic models. Not necessarily ideal in terms of durability and fingerprints can quickly appear.

    Accessible

    On the command side, all the actions of the deleted keys obviously remain accessible via the FN key. You can also access some additional shortcuts to manage your music, the sound volume or the intensity of RGB lighting. Classic.

    The Vulcan II Mini is also compatible with the EasyShift[+] option, found on most of the brand’s mice and keyboards. The feature provides access to an alternative mapping and therefore benefits from many additional shortcuts.

    By default, the option is activated when you hold down the TAB key, but you can also imagine activating it from your Roccat mouse . These options are adjusted from the Roccat Swarm software that we present to you a little further down.

    At the back of the keyboard, there are two retractable feet allowing the tilt to be adjusted on two levels. A rubber insert placed on the front part of the base ensures good stability to the whole.

    Finally, let’s finish with a point on connectivity. The Roccat model works only wired, via a USB-C connector placed in the center of its rear edge. For once, we would have liked the manufacturer to finally offer a switch to wireless with this new version in compact format. The keyboard could thus have been placed as an alternative to the Corsair K70 Mini Wireless , Razer Blackwidow V3 Mini HyperSpeed ​​or Cooler Master CK721 .

    Roccat Swarm Software

    As explained above, the different keyboard options can be configured via the in-house Roccat Swarm software. It is available free of charge from the manufacturer’s site and if you already have it, all you have to do is launch it and then update it.

    The tool allows you to create up to 5 configuration profiles, which can then be automatically loaded according to your games or applications. Enough to allow it to display good versatility despite its compact format.

    From the “Key assignment” tab, you can modify the secondary mapping of the keys, the one accessible via the EasyShift[+] functionality. Here, it is possible to choose among the different categories of actions already offered by Roccat or to create your own macros.

    The EasyShift[+] option is activated by default by holding the Tab key, but only when the keyboard is in “Gaming” mode, which can be activated via Fn + Windows.

    On the lighting side, they are configured from a second tab. Here you can choose between different effects or customize each of the keys with the color of your choice. Nothing really new on that side, even if we have to admit that some competitors offer slightly more complete options, including the possibility of customizing several layers of lighting.

    A new tab is also appearing on the lower part of the software, allowing you to customize the second LED found on 30 keys of the keyboard, namely those offering a second mapping accessible via the FN key. To our surprise, only some of them are customizable, especially those dedicated to media or sound volume. For example, the second lighting of the numeric keys is not customizable, while the latter have two LEDs.

    Also, for some keys the second lighting is always activated, while for others it only activates when the action in question is activated. In short, all this deserves in our opinion to be reworked a little and we hope that a firmware update will offer a little more latitude on the side of these second lights because the idea is rather good.

    Overall, the Roccat software meets most of our expectations, but as often, we regret an interface that is not necessarily the most intuitive. The tool has changed very little in recent years and a global overhaul would be really welcome.

    Switches & Performances

    The Vulcan II Mini inaugurates the brand’s new optical switches: the Roccat Titan II Optical. They take up a design fairly close to the manufacturer’s previous linear switches, still with a total stroke of 3.6 mm, an activation at 1.4 mm and a force of 65 g. They are advertised with a durability of 100 million activations.

    Without really giving more details about their design, the brand promises an even smoother activation with this second generation. These new switches mainly benefit from a revised design at the stem level, offering much better compatibility with other keycaps .

    In use, these new switches are rather convincing and we benefit from a pleasant keystroke. Activation is perfectly responsive and the keyboard does well for both gaming and office use. However, not everyone will necessarily be a fan of the keycaps installed by default on the Vulcan II Mini and these require a little time to adapt to keys with a more classic design.

    On the noise side, Roccat improves what we discovered on the previous Vulcan TKL Pro. The switches are quieter when activated and above all no longer resonate inside the chassis. Good news !

    Conclusion

    With this Roccat Vulcan II Mini, the brand presents its first mechanical keyboard in an ultra-compact format. Fans of the range will therefore now have the choice between three different sizes, with the classic “Full-Size” version, the TKL model and therefore this new 65% version.

    The keyboard itself does not really revolutionize the sector. In addition to its design which contrasts a little with the competition, the rest is rather classic. Offered at the manufacturer price of €149 , we could have expected a little more from Roccat, with in particular wireless connectivity options or even a “Hot-Swap” design.

  • Review Logitech G203 Lightsync Wired Gaming Mouse

    Logitech G203 Gaming Mouse Review

    At the end of 2016, Logitech launched a mouse dedicated to professional gamers. Simply called “Pro” (initially “Pro Gaming” and also called “G Pro”). A mouse unfortunately sold at a high price (79.99 €) despite a simple design and embedded technologies already proven by the Swiss manufacturer.

    Never mind, Logitech has decided to decline this mouse in a more affordable version ($40). The G203 Prodigy, which does not ultimately have much to envy its big sister.

    Good Gaming Mouse

    A good gaming mouse can easily cost north of $ 100, but Logitech is targeting budget-conscious people today with its latest gaming mouse entry, which costs just $ 40. The Logitech G203 Lightsync may be cheap, but it certainly doesn’t skimp on features.

    See Also : Logitech G305 Best Wired Gaming Mouse

    In addition to offering six fully programmable buttons, the “Gaming Grade” sensor can be adjusted between 200 and 8,000 DPI, allowing per-game adjustment if required. Best of all, the G203 is compatible with the Logitech G Hub app, which lets you save up to five presets.

    Buttons for Logitech G203

    The main left and right mouse buttons are equipped with a proprietary “Logitech G Button Tension System” metal spring which is intended to provide a consistent click experience throughout the life of the mouse. And as the name suggests, the G203 features the Lightsync RGB lighting system, enabling mouse-driven light shows using 16.8 million colors.

    At $ 40, it’s a good starting point for anyone to get into PC gaming. Logitech has configured the G203 to work with no modifications needed until you are ready to do so.

    It’s also highly compatible, working with Windows 7, 8, and 10, as well as macOS 10.10 or later and Chrome OS. Finally, there are two color options: white and black, the USB cable is 2.1 meters long. Which should be enough for any configuration,

    Ergonomics

    At first glance, it’s hard to find any differences between the G203 Prodigy and the G Pro. The shell is identical, made of plastic with a grainy coating to avoid fingerprints, the finish is just as neat and the mouse still seems robust.

    See Also :Logitech G502 Hero Mouse Gaming Review

    Only the cable changes, since that of the Pro is braided when that of the G203 is sheathed. The latter is nevertheless quite flexible and does not seem particularly less solid. In short, it is not in terms of design or ergonomics that the two mice stand out.

    We also emit the same criticisms of the G203, that is to say that if its ambidextrous shape seems interesting for left-handers, the presence of buttons only on the left edge significantly reduces the interest of this mouse for this fringe. users.

    Of course, this avoids involuntary activations for right-handed people, but one could have imagined a different arrangement of the buttons or a system of removable buttons as on the G900 to avoid these inconveniences. Alas, left-handed players will not look more to the G203 than to the G Pro.

    Handling For Logitech G203

    The handling is not without reproach either. Indeed, if the plastic is not unpleasant in the hand, it remains relatively slippery, especially on the edges, which can make lifting and rapid movements a little tricky.

    Fortunately, the small size of the G203 (116.6 x 62.2 x 38.2 mm), its low mass (85 g, or 2 g more than the G Pro) and the inclination of its edges allow a good maneuverability.

    As long as you hold the mouse firmly enough, there is no contraindication to using it in low sensitivity, for example, even if you tend to prefer non-slip coatings on the edges to avoid any risk . Small mouse requires, we prefer to use it with the fingertips or as a claw. Only small hands can put all or part of the palm on it.

    Comfort Mouse for G203

    The G203 therefore aims above all for a certain nervousness rather than comfort. And this can be seen right down to the main click buttons. Very sensitive, they also benefit from the tension system that Logitech uses on its gaming mice since the G900. A small spring keeps the button contactor on that of the switch to improve the consistency of the click and its responsiveness.

    If the G203 does benefit from Omron switches, like the G Pro. These are only guaranteed for 10 million activations (20 for the G Pro).

    The two slice buttons are also quite convincing, producing a fairly sharp click. Their small size, however, makes them less accessible than those of mice like the G403. The click of the dial is also of good quality and tastes good not to be too hard. Finally, the last button located above the wheel is used to change the sensitivity of the mouse on the fly. If it is not very accessible, we reach it despite everything without twisting our fingers too much.

    For its part, the wheel is very good for the game, with its notches sufficiently well marked. No horizontal scrolling on the other hand, it is about a wheel all that there is of more basic. Mouse for gamers requires, here we can not escape the single-zone RGB backlighting which illuminates both the brand’s G logo and a small border at the base of the mouse.

    It has no function apart from aesthetics and will therefore be content to brighten up the offices of those who appreciate multicolored lights. This backlight is fortunately not disturbing in use, the hand largely covering the illuminated areas. It is also possible to deactivate it.

    Precision

    The biggest difference between G203 and G Pro is indeed in the innards of the mouse, in particular at the level of the sensor. Exit the Pixart PMW3366, make way for a home sensor called “Mercury”. Still of optical type, this one displays inferior technical characteristics: maximum acceleration supported of 25 g. Operation at speeds of 5.08 m / s and adjustable sensitivity from 200 to 8000 dpi.

    This is still enough to satisfy the players. very few of them being the most nervous capable of exceeding such speeds. Even while performing the ample and rapid movements required to play in very low sensitivity.

    The same goes for the maximum sensitivity, largely sufficient to go so far as to meet the expectations of those who use several Ultra HD screens.

     

    In practice, it is therefore difficult to fault this Mercury sensor, the difference with the PMW3366 being fairly maintained. We can barely notice a very slightly better feeling of fluidity with the Pixart sensor or the Hero sensor of the latest Logitech mice. But this is really not significant. In any case, we did not find any fault in acceleration or stability during our tests.

    Regarding the recognition of surfaces. If it is always necessary to avoid glass and other surfaces that are too shiny or transparent with an optical sensor. we have not detected any particular problem here with fabric or plastic mouse pads, or even with our slightly satin desk. The G203’s sensor seems to behave as well as the G Pro’s.

    Logitech Assistant Software

    Logitech’s Video Game Assistant software, common to the manufacturer’s various gaming peripherals. Allows you to create multiple usage profiles to automatically adapt settings to stored applications.

    For each profile, it is thus possible to change the assignment of the keys and to set up to five levels of sensor sensitivity. The backlight can also be changed to take advantage of different light effects.

    Finally, an option makes it possible to optimize the precision of the sensor according to the surface on which the mouse is used.

    STRONG POINTS

    • Compact and light.
    • Pleasant handling, well-placed buttons.
    • Convincing optical sensor.
    • Responsive buttons.
    • Integrated memory.
    • Robust design.

    WEAK POINTS

    • Rather intended for right-handed people despite its symmetrical shape (buttons only on the left edge).
    • Dial without side buttons.
    • Slippery coating.

    CONCLUSION

    Despite the use of a sensor that is less swift than that of the G Pro, the G203 Prodigy is doing with honors. Above all, its half price makes it much more attractive for players looking for a small, lively and robust mouse, particularly suitable for FPS and Moba.

  • Hyperx Cloud Revolver S Review

    Hyperx Cloud Revolver S Review

    Hyperx Cloud Revolver S Review – This new gaming headset marks a turning point at HyperX: new name, new look, new materials, new microphone. Above all, the manufacturer wants to seduce FPS enthusiasts by offering a model that would be studied for the practice of the genre thanks to excellent sound spatialization . Let’s see if all these changes risk turning the Revolver against its builder.

    Ergonomics

    Even if its atypical look may surprise you, the HyperX Revolver is an over-ear headset that benefits from good manufacturing quality, serious assembly, a large metal headband and plastic shells to protect the ear cups. The only details that bother us concern the apparent wiring between the top of the ear cups and the base of the lower hoop as well as the non-removable cable.

    Apart from that, the helmet is both strong, light and relatively flexible, which bodes well for good durability if you take a minimum of care of your belongings. If you are often on the move, know that HyperX has chosen to get rid of the many accessories that were one of the strengths of the Cloud . So there is no storage case to protect the headphones or even an extension cable or additional pads.

    Comfort

    This Revolver uses a double headband that is increasingly found in the world of audio gaming . This choice is quite clearly inspired by what can be found at Steelseries with the Siberia 650, for example. The problem with this upper metal hoop is that it tends to resonate when wearing the helmet on the head and touching this part. Fortunately, the phenomenon is much better controlled here.

    HyperX has kept the headband of the Cloud, but the foam here is a little more flexible and airy. The two earpieces are connected to the headband by a ball-and-socket pivot system that allows slight vertical or horizontal movement. The removable leatherette pads are similar to those of the Cloud: they are particularly thick and soft to the touch.

    This combination adds a new dimension to the comfort provided. The Revolver sits naturally on the head and adapts quite well to different body types, especially larger heads. The weight is well distributed and the pressure points are homogeneous all around the ears. The pads do not provide an extreme feeling of heat.

    Good Controler

    However, we find that the pressure exerted on the top of the head is just a little too much for large heads in the first few hours, which can be annoying if you decide to do long sessions from the start. The shaping and softening of the pad are done little by little, but you always feel a little the arch in the end. A slightly more flexible and less thick lower arch could have changed the situation. The acoustic design is a bit more open, so the passive isolation is far from extreme. It still allows you to cut yourself off from the environment to be comfortable in the game.

    The Revolver connects to console controllers and mobile devices via a particularly thick braided cable that measures about one meter. It ends with a 3.5 mm 4-pin mini-jack connector. A 2m extension cable, which terminates in a double 3.5mm 3-point mini-jack is also supplied. It embeds a command that allows you to control the listening volume via a continuous potentiometer and which allows you to mute the microphone via a switch. Like many other headsets, the Revolver does not have a dedicated computer application.

    Audio

    The sound performance of this headset is generally good. The rendering is certainly musical and the W signature is marked, but in the end it remains relatively controlled and precise.

    The low end is delivered with great depth, but it’s not extremely warm. This remains controlled, however, because the membranes never really get carried away and there is only a small masking effect on the low mids. The voices are particularly well put forward. They are clear and intelligible, but female vocals lack a bit of warmth and therefore sound more pinched than male vocals.

    This W signature is still a little marked in the high-mids/treble. The sibilance wakes up from time to time depending on the songs, just like the “fff” of the voices. The guitars, especially the electric guitars with distortion, are a bit sharper and more aggressive than usual. Our favorite pieces in this kind of case, signed The Dillinger Escape Plan and Oh, Sleeper, however, remain soft enough to be listened to without being too aggressive.

    The Revolver offers a nice reproduction of stereophony even if, again, we expected even more width. However, the sound stage remains particularly readable and each element that composes it is easily identifiable. This is less the case in depth, especially on the evaluation of the distance in play. It is a little better than what the Cloud is capable of, but not as good as some other references.

    Microphone

    This model also innovates in terms of microphone. This one still remains removable and gooseneck, but it is now without windshield and protected by rubber. It is easy to handle and easily positioned in front of the mouth. It captures the voice very well and cuts out enough outside noise to be heard clearly. However, a small gain boost will not be too much to achieve a good level of capture.

    Conclusion

    Hyper took a risky bet by changing a large part of the codes that made the Cloud so successful . The new design of the Revolver is more comfortable and more adapted to different morphologies, but the many accessories have disappeared. The sound reproduction is really different, but it remains overall controlled and precise. In the end, and contrary to what HyperX announces, this model has nothing really special for FPS games. It will satisfy those looking for an effective closed helmet that does not isolate extremely, but which offers a greater feeling of ventilation.

     

  • Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 : Review The gaming laptop

    Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 is the spearhead of the Republic of Gamers range. This version is equipped with an Intel Core i9-12900H processor with Alder Lake architecture. While the GPU is entrusted to Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3070 Ti.

    Presentation The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 is a portable PC model designed primarily/ notebook gaming for gamers looking for the best in technology without compromising on performance. A showcase for the Taiwanese manufacturer. This model also gives it the opportunity to prove its know-how with some exclusive features. Such as the ROG Keystone, an NFC key that is inserted on the right of the keyboard and allows you to personalize the PC, or even to access a hidden partition.

    Construction The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    The ROG Strix Scar 17 is far from being a model of sobriety. From the hood, its membership in the Republic Of Gamers is well highlighted. In plastic, it sports the famous backlit ROG eye. The most attentive will also have noticed the selective varnish strip adorned with the ROG logo, which crosses the hood diagonally.

    Opening the screen reveals a two-tone piano with an opaque black side and another transparent. Apart from the “wow” effect of the discovery, its usefulness is nil: no real component is visible, not even a rotating fan. The coating of the piano suffers from the absence of anti-fingerprint treatment, the slightest pressure on it leaving marks that are difficult to clean. Cleaning is also complicated and often leaves traces.

    Keyboard

    The RGB backlit keyboard provides a pleasant typing with a good response. It has a full numeric keypad and five macro keys on its top. It is obviously possible to customize the backlight with the Armory Crate software – the possibilities offered are such that you could spend the afternoon there.

    Like the keyboard, the large touchpad offers a smooth glide and the various Windows gestures are well taken into account. On the far right on the right edge, a location is provided for the ROG Keystone (in red with the ROG logo). This is a key equipped with an NFC chip that allows you to link an ROG account in order to find its personalization profiles (ventilation, backlighting, etc.).  and to set up a storage space only visible when the key is present.

    Connectivity

    The connectivity of the Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 goes to the essentials with two USB 3.2 ports and a jack on the left side. Behind the screen, between the two vents, are two USB-C ports, an HDMI port and an RJ45 socket to the 2.5G standard.

    Access to these ports is also quite painful, because there is no indication on the chassis to indicate their presence. We also regret the absence of a memory card reader, a webcam and, to a lesser extent, a fingerprint reader to unlock the session. However, there is plenty of space on this 17-inch chassis.

    The wireless connection is ensured, not by an Intel chip as we could have believed, but a MediaTek version. The MT7922, also used at AMD under the name RZ616, manages wifi 6E at 2400 Mb/s and Bluetooth 5.2.

    Cooling

    In terms of cooling, Asus has provided the ROG Strix Scar 17 with two fans, four radiators, four heat pipes and liquid metal type thermal paste to maximize heat exchange.

    Thermal imaging does not reveal anything alarming for a laptop dedicated to gaming. On the keyboard, the temperatures recorded are even rather low with just under 41 ° C at the hottest point. The ZQSD keys oscillate around 35°C, while the rest of the keyboard stays perfectly cool.

    The dedicated CPU vents are the hottest after our gaming session with almost 58°C behind the screen and 55.8°C on the left side. The vents on the right for the GPU are 10°C cooler.

    Noise pollution amounts to 50.5 dB in Turbo mode. Suffice to say that the neighbors will be quite annoyed after about fifteen minutes of play. Using Performance mode in Armory Crate reduces the perceived sound level by two (47.1 dB), while Silent mode does not exceed 37 .1dB.

    The level of performance will be impacted by the cooling mode. Thus, we obtain 82 fps under Assassin’s Creed Valhalla in Turbo mode, the Performance mode allowing 74 fps, while the Silent mode will “only” offer 60 fps.

    Performance The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    To animate its ROG Strix Scar 17, Asus has teamed up with Intel and therefore integrates a Core i9-12900H with Alder Lake hybrid architecture, 32 GB of DDR5 RAM and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti graphics card. Let’s go back to the processor.

    Which therefore has six high-performance cores (P-Cores), hyperthreaded and clocked at 2.5 GHz with a boost of 5 GHz, and eight low-power cores (E-Cores) at 1.8 GHz with a boost of 3.8GHz. During an encoding, we noted an average frequency of 3.61 GHz for the P-Cores and 2.79 GHz. For the E-Cores with respective maximum frequencies of 4.92 GHz and 3.79 GHz.

    The performance index of the Core i9-12900H is 176, far ahead of the Ryzen 9 5900HX. Core i9-11980HK which have an index close to 140 depending on the laptop in which they are integrated. Note, however, that the score of the Core i9-12900H could have been higher if the cooling system managed to keep the temperature of the Core i9 cores below 100°C. Beyond this temperature, the processor reduces its frequency and therefore performance. We were thus able to observe drops in framerate in game when the processor sporadically drops to 399 MHz.

    Games The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    ROG Strix Scar 17 features the latest GPU announced by Nvidia , the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. The version selected by Asus claims a maximum TGP of 150 W; it is therefore the most efficient version of this GPU.

    Thus equipped, the ROG Strix Scar 17 obtains a performance index of 195. Slightly lower than the Lenovo Legion 5 Pro equipped with a GeForce RTX 3070 (140 W). The explanation is to be found on the side of the processor, which lowers its frequency. A phenomenon particularly visible in Call Of Duty and Cyberpunk 2077. Dragging with it the frequency of the GPU, even in the most performance (and therefore ventilation) mode. high offered by the Asus Armory Crate software (Turbo mode).

    Full HD Definition Screen

    With a Full HD definition and all the settings pushed to the maximum, our range of games runs at around 90 fps without raytracing. Activating the latter drastically drops the number of frames per second, so you have to activate DLSS to go above the 60 fps mark in compatible games.

    In 2560 x 1440 px – the native definition of our ROG Strix Scar 17 panel. With rasterized rendering, the number of images per second displayed is around 60 fps, a good point. Only Cyberpunk 2077 gets an average framerate of 39 fps. Enabling raytracing makes Cyberpunk 2077, Metro EE, and The Medium barely playable. Therefore, the activation of DLSS will be necessary to enjoy these games.

    Screen The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    The ROG Scar 17 is equipped with an IPS panel displaying 2560 x 1440 px and able to reach a refresh rate of 240 Hz. Asus also offers a Full HD version which reaches 360 Hz . If you play competitive games online, we recommend this 360 Hz version. As for fans of the latest AAA games, the version we tested seems more appropriate.

    The WQHD panel selected by Asus obtains a delta E of 1.8, well below 3 where the colorimetric drifts begin to be visible. The color temperature also comes close to the theoretical ideal of 6500 K (6574 K measured). The contrast is on the other hand a little weak with 1104:1 readings with the probe. Nothing alarming, but the blacks will draw a little on the grays.

    The brightness is 304 cd / m², a sufficient value for indoor use, knowing that the panel has a good anti-reflective treatment (reflectance measured at 17.8%). Finally, an essential point for a laptop dedicated to gaming, the responsiveness of the panel was measured at 9 ms. Which places the ROG Scar 17 among the most valiant in our database.

    Audio The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    Asus has given its ROG Scar 17 four speakers: two under the screen and facing the user. These act as tweeters  and two others placed under the chassis at the front. Which act as woofers. Listening, the sound volume is more than enough to enjoy its films and series, the stereo being well marked.

    The headphone output provides an output level strong enough to handle high impedance headphones. The distortion and crosstalk measurement does not reveal any anomalies. However, we regret a somewhat weak dynamic which could annoy sound professionals.

    Mobility / Autonomy The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    The measurements of the Strix Scar 17 are 39 x 28 cm for 2.83 cm at its thickest point. We are far from the gaming laptops that we knew a few years ago with thicknesses exceeding 4 cm. Its weight of 2.9 kg also places it in the average of 17.3-inch gaming laptops . It is therefore quite possible to transport the ROG Strix Scar 17 in a suitable backpack.

    Asus has equipped the Scar 17 with a 90 Wh battery. A substantial capacity, but which does not make it possible to last the day. In video playback with the screen set to 200 cd / m², the Scar 17 allowed us to watch our favorite series for 6 h 40 min (Netflix under Chrome).

    Conclusion The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17

    The Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 offers a high-flying configuration with its 12th Gen Intel Core i9 processor and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. Its properly calibrated and responsive screen allows you to fully enjoy video games, with or without raytracing activated. However, the quality of the plastics is not up to the performance. Nor is the cooling system which, unfortunately, struggles to cool the assembly, limiting the capabilities of the assembly.

  • Test The Roccat Tyon, a mouse ready to take off

    Test The Roccat Tyon

    Presentation

    The Roccat Tyon. When it comes to mice, it’s hard to reinvent the wheel. This does not prevent manufacturers from trying welcome developments, especially in the field of mice for gamers. Roccat is trying a new experience with the Tyon, with a palette of customizable buttons and an analog stick to manage movements in height in addition to the traditional laser sensor. A mouse for flight simulation enthusiasts?

    Design and Ergonomic  The Roccat Tyon

    Result of Test The Roccat Tyon From the first grip, a familiar feeling sets in. And for good reason, the Tyon resumes the general shape and approaches the dimensions of the Kone XTD . The arrangement of its many buttons allows to consider a good modularity in the games. The backlighting is limited to the wheel and a border around the base of the mouse

    The thumbhole is nice, but is intended exclusively for right-handed people. The sides are made of granular plastic, to ensure a firm grip, while the palm rest and the two main buttons benefit from a softer coating. Nothing to say, it’s classic.

    Test The Roccat Tyon

    13.5 cm long and 7.8 cm wide, that’s what it takes for a good grip and long playing sessions. The glide is ensured by two large Teflon pads at the front and on the back of the mouse. It is impeccable on fabrics, silicone or hard carpets. On the weight side, we are at 130 grams, a well weighted mouse but not too heavy either.

     

    See Also : Roccat Kone Pure Ultra  Mouse Test And Software Update

     

    Buttons for Roccat Kone Pure

    It is on the side of the buttons that the Tyon stands out. In addition to the two main buttons of the click wheel, there are also two buttons on each side of the main ones, a right and left button under the wheel, an EasyShift + button at the base of the mouse on the left and finally the analog stick above the two buttons under the thumb.

    As usual, the Omron mechanical switches on the buttons are responsive. Remember that the EasyShift + function allows you to assign two commands to each button and to switch between them via the dedicated button.

    Input Device The Roccat Tyon

    The analog stick (the X-Celerator) is recognized as a joystick via Direct Input (the API that manages input devices). It can therefore be used by all games that recognize controllers. For use on Battlefield 4 , for example, we have abandoned the joystick, until then only reserved for the helicopter, to keep only the mouse. Be careful, we still have a few small complaints: the EasyShift + button, badly placed under the thumb, is sometimes activated inadvertently. The right / left button above the mouse turns out to be quite difficult to reach with your fingertips, but you end up getting used to activating it with a knuckle, even if it is not very natural at first.

    Precision The Roccat Tyon

    Unsurprisingly, there is communication up to 1000 Hz with the PC for formidable precision. It is also possible to decrease the frequency to 500 or 125 Hz for use on older PCs.

    Our test protocol measures the number of meters / second that a mouse can absorb, but does not give the maximum value just what can be done with a human arm.

    With its 8200 dpi laser sensor, it is impossible to fault the Tyon with the strength of our little arms. The mouse collected up to 7.4 m / s with our test software. It is therefore prepared for any brutal movement in play; no worries on that side.

    Conclusion The Roccat Tyon

    After Test The Roccat Tyon, Relatively specialized for flight simulators, the Roccat Tyon can however perfectly adapt to any type of game. With a more than reasonable amount of programmable buttons and its analog stick, the latest from Roccat also offers a comfortable grip. It is in any case the most versatile gaming mouse on the market.

    Software For Roccat

    Software Support

     

  • AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT Test, software, manual guide

    AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT test: a graphics card that ticks on raytracing

    The Radeon RX 6600 XT is positioned by AMD as an ideal graphics card for gaming in good conditions on a Full HD monitor. A model which therefore aims to overshadow its direct rival, the GeForce RTX 3060.

    The Radeon RX 6600 XT is the fifth generation Navi / RDNA2 graphics card from AMD. Displayed at a starting public price of € 380, it is positioned as an entry-level, even mid-range solution. The manufacturer is targeting here players wishing to equip themselves with a graphics card capable of correctly supplying a Full HD monitor.

    The technical point

    As for the entire Radeon RX 6000 family, we find under the heatsink of the Radeon RX 6600 XT a GPU using the RDNA2 graphics architecture. We will not go into detail on this architecture that we discussed in our full test of the Radeon RX 6800 XT.

    See Also : Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Driver  Update

    If the architecture is identical to the rest of the series, the chip is for its part unique. It is a Navi 23 GPU with 32 execution blocks (CU) for 2,048 compute units. For the other units, there are 128 units dedicated to textures, 64 rendering units or even 32 units dedicated to accelerating effects rendered in raytracing.

    Chace System

    The Infinity Cache system is renewed, but it is limited to 32 MB, thus making it possible to reduce the size of the chip (237 mm²) – and therefore its cost. The 11.1 billion transistors are etched in 7 nm by TSMC, like the entire series.

    The operating frequency of the GPU is, as with all Radeon RX 6000s, quite high. AMD announces a base frequency of 1968 MHz, for an average frequency in games at 2589 MHz.

    Memory

    For memory, the 128-bit bus and aggressive pricing positioning desired by AMD left no other choice than an orientation towards 8 GB of GDDR6 at 2000 MHz. As a result, memory bandwidth is limited to 256 GB / s.

    In return, the energy envelope is rather contained, with 160 watts announced by AMD, compared to the 230 watts of the Radeon RX 6700 XT or to the 170 watts of the GeForce RTX 3060, its direct competitor in the Nvidia catalog.

    Construction

    Unlike the Radeon RX 6700 XT and higher models, the Radeon RX 6600 XT is not offered as a reference model. In other words, only the so-called ” custom ” models will be marketed by the GPU manufacturer’s partners. For our tests, AMD provided us with an MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming X. This model is slightly overclocked at the GPU level (+18 MHz).

    Consumption

    The power envelope of the MSI graphics card we tested was pushed to 180 watts, compared to 160 watts recommended by AMD. One way to achieve higher operating frequencies.

    In practice, we have actually measured this power consumption, with peaks of 190 watts. This nonetheless remains good energy efficiency, which is common to the entire Radeon RX 6000 range.

    Performance in games

    The MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming X that we used in our test posted an average effective frequency of 2640MHz in most games at 1440p rendering.

    With this GPU, AMD clearly has its sights set on Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3060. The latter is outstripped in classic rendering games. This is valid for both Full HD and 1440p.

    RDNA2 Architecture

    However, the RDNA2 architecture has shortcomings in games that exploit raytracing effects. This is true once again here, where the Radeon is clearly positioned behind its signed rival Nvidia.

    We hoped that the FSR would give this model a performance boost, but it is clear that we will have to wait several more months before this upscaling technology is implemented in a significant number of games.

    Nvidia still keeps a lead here with DLSS, more adopted by developers at the time of this writing.

    Higher Definition

    The Radeon RX 6600 XT does its job in that it offers enough resources to play properly in Full HD. The higher definition (1440p) is also possible, although it will probably be necessary to go down some levels of graphic detail to maintain fluidity in the busiest scenes of the latest games.

    Faster than the GeForce RTX 3060 in classic games, it also comes at a high price, or € 379 recommended starting price.

    More Complicated

    But now, the graphics card scene is now much more complicated than that. First of all, there is raytracing, which largely reshuffles the cards. On this, AMD is no match for Nvidia, which systematically keeps a step ahead at this level.

    By activating this type of effects, the performance of the Radeon RX 6600 XT collapses in such a way that it rarely becomes possible to maintain a satisfactory fluidity.

    Problem

    This problem is all the more important as raytracing compatible games are becoming commonplace, just as DLSS support tends to be generalized on most large video game productions.

    Conversely, the AMD FSR upscaling technique is currently quite confidential. Worse still, it is only of interest in higher definitions (ideally in 4K), the graphics rendering in Full HD being particularly degraded, whatever the level of quality selected.

    A sum that seems too high for a model that does not allow us to take advantage of the refinements of raytracing .

    Radeon RX 6600 XT Software And Manual

    Software Driver and Manual > Download

    Conclusion

    The Radeon RX 6600 XT is a very good graphics card for gamers who want to play on a Full HD monitor and have no desire to enable raytracing in compatible games.

    For them, this model offers performance at a very good level and the controlled power consumption leaves the possibility for manufacturers to offer models with discrete cooling. For others, it is better to turn to a GeForce RTX 3060 or a GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.

  • Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2 Review Headphones

    Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2

    Review Audio Technica is riding on the success of its iconic ATH-M50 headphones. And giving it a third lease of life with the ATH-M50xBT2 to conquer nomadic music lovers. This 2nd Bluetooth version is of course accompanied by many new features.

    Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2 Date Release

    Freshly launched for the start of the 2021 school year. The ATH-M50xBT2 carries with it the heritage of the M50 line and is positioned as the standard bearer of the Japanese brand’s audio know-how with the general public on the Bluetooth mobile headset market.  It is therefore not surprising that Audio Technica highlights the history of this range to stand out.

    Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2 Focusing on improvement

    This “v2” does not bring any real changes on the acoustic level. All the new features focusing on improving the experience of using the headset. Multipoint connection, USB-C port, better call quality, autonomy even more generous. Compatibility with the LDAC codec, smartphone application to extend the possibilities of personalization. And all this without seeing the marketing price increase.

    All the ingredients therefore seem to come together to make this ATH-M50xBT2 a very good mobile headset. And that’s what we’re going to try to check during this test.

    Manufacturing & accessories

    The ATH-M50xBT2 is strictly identical to its predecessors in terms of design. Capitalizing again and again on its “studio/monitoring” heritage, these headphones are therefore functional, at the risk of not being the most elegant and discreet there is.

    There’s not much that can be criticized for its overall sturdiness and maneuverability. The headband resists twisting without flinching and the hinges allow both an ultra generous pivot of the ear cups as well on the horizontal axis than vertical. While allowing the latter to fold up towards the arch.

    No rigid case, but a soft carrying pouch is provided to accommodate the headset. And its two detachable cables (a small USB-C to USB-A cable and a mini-jack cable of about 1.2 m).

    Comfort & support

    Without fundamental design changes, the ATH-M50xBT2 provides the same comfort experience as its predecessor.

    Weight the helmet

    the weight of the helmet (310 g) is very well balanced, as are the pressure points and pinch effects which remain discreet. The generous deployment of the notched headband of the helmet allows it to find its place on the head, large or small, without any problem.

    The ear cups do not leave a monster room to accommodate his ears, but it remains sufficient in terms of width and height. The good thickness of the pads allows a pleasant contact, failing to let the ears breathe.

    User experience

    As we mentioned in the presentation of this test, the second version of this ATH-M50xBT is largely justified by numerous ergonomic changes which make the headphones very pleasant to use on a daily basis.

    Getting started is childish. Many alerts are integrated to guide the user. Unless you are absolutely Anglophobic the voice aids being only offered in English. Beginners will have no trouble finding their way around. The headset houses a line of 4 mechanical buttons that provide access to all the essential controls, and even a little more.

    The circular button is in fact dedicated to waking up the voice assistant of the smartphone. And can even serve as a shortcut to interact with Amazon Alexa.  Since the headset displays advanced compatibility with this assistant. As was the case on the previous model, we can still point out the few difficulties in sometimes differentiating certain buttons from each other.

    For those who want to go further, Audio Technica has some nice surprises in store thanks to its Audio Technica Connect app (iOS/Android). It gives us the pleasure of offering a whole range of relevant advanced features. And settings while maintaining a simple and intuitive interface. There are the classic indications of battery level, volume, some user guides, the possibility of locating your headphones more easily or of selecting the Bluetooth codec (SBC, AAC or LDAC when the playback device allows it) .

    Autonomy

    As if the promise of 50 hours of autonomy were not already impressive. The ATH-M50xBT2 was even more generous during our test. The headphones indeed delivered us on multiple occasions more than 55 hours of use, passing moreover by the most energy-consuming Bluetooth codec (LDAC). It goes without saying that this is an excellent score, capable of satisfying the most intensive uses.

    Handsfree

    The quality of voice capture was not the strong point of the first ATH-M50xBT. Audio Technica has therefore endeavored to improve this point on this second version.

    Latency

    Improving communication latency in Bluetooth was also one of the works carried out by the manufacturer for this ATH-M50xBT. Basically, the headphones are not the brightest, even if joint use with a video playback application allows you to take advantage of sufficient automatic compensation not to feel any lag disabling.

    For all other use cases that could not benefit from this compensation. The headset has a “Low Latency” mode which drastically reduces the delay induced by the Bluetooth connection to less than 90 ms. The perceived sound/image shift is then much more acceptable, for playing video games on smartphones or Switches, for example.

    • audio-technica ath-m50xbt2
    • Review audio-technica ath-m50xbt2
    • audio-technica ath-m50xbt2 wireless headphone
    • audio-technica ath-m50xbt2 bluetooth closed-back studio monitoring headphones